Bicep_Builder

(Can you change two letters?) Range.

Easle.

Drxyster Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Perhaps some of the past and future posters on > this subject may wish to comment on the > following. > > > If you knew a woman who was pregnant, who had 8 > kids already, three who > were deaf, two who were blind, one mentally > retarded, and she had > syphilis, would you recommend that she was > sterilised or had an abortion? > > > if you recommend sterilisation or abortion Ludwig > van Beethoven would never have been born. Oh god not that 'beethoven' bollocks again.

Firestarter - The Prodigy

Seek and Destroy - Metallica

Aww, dear Patt Condell. Bless his heart.

The aim of the game is to guess the rap song which is being referred to by the portrait figure. For example; http://i.imgur.com/ojugk.jpg Use the template to make your own: http://i.imgur.com/6qWul.jpg To upload your finished masterpiece, I recommend Imgur.

I thought you didn't have to change one if it wasn't necessary? D: Sound

Dyson

Snowy

When the lib dems make a hilarious cock up and act as a meat shield for Cameron and co it lights a warm fire in my heart, it really does.

clarify please, dear. Because apparently you can only accuse people in public of doing what they've been convicted of by the courts.

>Vine Cable brings legislation concerning tuition fees to the house and defends it. >Suggests he will abstain from the vote. >My face http://i829.photobucket.com/albums/zz214/racooon1/madmenreaction.jpg

Presumably portraying Al Capone as an evil gangster is an infringement of human rights too, since he was only convicted of tax dodging? Oh looney left, never change...

Apparently not...

You're assuming that they didn't and the police would have acted on it. Which they quite possibly wouldn't have.

I honestly don't get what the argument opposing the actions of the shop owner are anymore; an ambiguous moral list of condecensions or some kind of human rights lawsuit. It seems to me it's hard to work out who's being 'disproportionate' ITT...

'Role in the community'? Certainly not. They're exercising their right to bar people from the shop due to them suspecting [the person pictured] to be criminals, and displaying their evidence in the window of said shop. My point was that saying that 'this is a violation of basic human rights' is completely ridiculous. Do you not think the [accused] would appeal to the authorities in the instance of their innocence?

Except that in this instance nobody is being punished in a court of law, it's one person distributing evidence on his property. If he was jailing them in his cellar you'd have a point, but they aren't, so you don't. 'Basic human rights' describe relationships between state and citizen, not inter-citizen relations (ordinarily).

Because you don't even know what 'human rights' are? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=european+convention+on+human+rights Now, try and quote from an article and explain how 'human rights' are being violated in this instance.

Battersea power station? Needs a bit of hoovering first obviously...

>i haven't come up with 'ridiculous hypotheticals' You really have. The owner of that shop has assessed evidence and decided that the best way of deterring shoplifters is to put up a picture of the culprit in his window. If that person was innocent, I'm willing to bet that they'd either confront the shopowner and/or inform the police. As it stands, it appears they have not done either. God knows why you're trying to attack the shopowner instead of the thief. Somehow you're trying to put the actions of the shopkeeper up there with witch hunters. It is completely barmy.

The name of that road always makes me giggle.

I honestly can't work out who's winding up who in this thread.

I don't know how computer savvy you are dear but there is no 'release' to find for caps lock.