Emerson Crane

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Emerson Crane Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > > More than aware of these "epitahs", since I've > > followed the club since 68, unlike Tick Tac who > > changes allegiances to suit his mood. Proper > plum. > > If I were to come out with the dross that he > trots > > out, I'd be told to be less antagonistic and > > confrontational, he, on the other hand, is seen > as > > a bit of a joker. The man is hilarious, just > like > > his clubs exploits in the CMPL, ooops sorry, I > > forgot that they aren't in it any more. Now I > > promise to leave it, provided Victoria Plum > drops > > it. > > > > When Henrik rode into town and took your one > chance of the big cup.... > > > > Obviously you won't let it lie, so let me ask you this. Was he playing for a scots club at the time? The only person on here that needs to take a long hard look at himself is you. I have no respect for the likes of you who readily admit he changed allegiances, because they are a "bigger" club. Yeah course they are, you tube. Big fish in a very small pond, nothing more nothing less. Now over to you.

The so called special one hasn't been beaten at home in 9 years but I sure I heard that Aris Salonika haven't lost at home for 40 years? Can't remember if that was just European games or all games. If thats right, that is some record!!

Bread

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > More than you want to be playing 'wall next > season? Jesus, that doesn't even bear thinking about!!

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ...a disaster? It would be foookin hilarious! It certainly would.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Went way above their heads Mick Mac...hadn't got > either Jah or Emerson down as Newbies but that > they both failed to remember when Boring and Lucky > were common epitahs for Arsenal is making me > rethink...;-) More than aware of these "epitahs", since I've followed the club since 68, unlike Tick Tac who changes allegiances to suit his mood. Proper plum. If I were to come out with the dross that he trots out, I'd be told to be less antagonistic and confrontational, he, on the other hand, is seen as a bit of a joker. The man is hilarious, just like his clubs exploits in the CMPL, ooops sorry, I forgot that they aren't in it any more. Now I promise to leave it, provided Victoria Plum drops it.

Thank god for that. Please stick with your second rate, sorry second club. Plum

No just think the fella is a plum, as for biting there so many on here that are champion biters.

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Arsenal are lucky. > > Arsenal are boring. Lucky they don't have you as a fan. As for boring, well I'd rather stick pins in my eyes than watch that SPL drivel. Celtic and Rangers are an embarrassment to the CMPL.

Friends - Shalamar

My point is quite simple, most people seemed to believe spurs would be able to get a result, on the other hand most people thought the Arsenal wouldn't get a result at home against Barca. But we did.

aired

Sandperson Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The problem with the top leagues in Europe and > arguably the top leagues anywhere is that, at > best, there's a handful of clubs who can win the > league. Saying one Spanish side is better than one > Italian side is a pointless comparison because > it's all relative. The only thing you can say is > that both teams are top of their league. Therefore > both English teams got a good result. I would add > that beating a team away would seem to me to be > more of an achievement than beating them at home > but the way Barca played last night, in the first > half at any rate, it was like they were playing at > home. We've beaten teams like Real Madrid, Inter and AC away in last few years. But you'll already know that, or should do.As for being blinkered, I find the fuss made about AC being beaten at home a tad OTT. Its been done.

See my friends - Kinks

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Although also agree with Jah that Spurs' win was a > great acheivement, and it's not fair to take it > away from them. Listen, a side with the likes of Gattuso and Seedorf in it is harldy going set the world alight, AC may be top of the Italian League but thats hardly a ringing endorsement. On the other hand, Barca are 5 points clear at the top of their league, which is far superior to Serie A by a long way, and I gave us very little chance it has to be said. But lets have it right, the result last night was the bigger achievement.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You took your chances. They said on tv that after > an hour, Barca had made 400 passes, to Arsenal's > 200, but you can pass it all day long, it's no > good if you dont pass it in to the bloody goal! > Take nothing away from Spurs, but think Arsenal > get the result of the week, even though they were > at home. At home yes, but playing arguably the best club side in the world, not some washed up Italian side full of 30 somethings. And lest we forget we turned them over at thier place a few seasons ago, as we did with Inter when we turned them over 5 - 1, and Real when Henry scored a blinder at their place and we won 1 nil. I'll be elated if we win at the camp nou, but very surprised. We'll have to defend better and when any chances come along be 100% clinical. Here's hoping.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Fair play Arsenal, that second goal was class! 1st goal weren't bad either. Spurs v the Arsenal at Wembley? Lets' get real here. We will do extremely well to win at their place, and does anyone realistically expect Spurs to get to the final? I know I don't. Jack the Lad was superb last night, but man of the match was Koscielny, who excelled last night. At last Arshavin showed us what he can do. Its only half time, and I'd be surprised if we progress, but at least our performance has stopped pundits talking about Spurs, thank god.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > this is part of the culture > > Exactly! People used to hunt for food, because > they basically had to. That is not the case here > and now. And that's because we've evolved and are a civilised society, allegedly.

I'd love to know what sparked it off.

Drums

Hoddle didn't have ANY man management skills, good player yeah, good manager, never.

Scribe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > > Then you're very easily amused. And in any case, > this *Bob* is only attempting humour so that he or > she can deflect and distract from the issue at > hand - an issue that he or she seems incapable of > discussing like an adult. The issue at hand is you like hunting, yes we get it.

Should Glenn Hoddle be pulled up for this? http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/855630-glenn-hoddle-says-sorry-for-fernando-torres-gaffe

Ms B Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- I also know some > vegetarians who make an exception for meat killed > this way as the animal will have had a natural > life and death. > > And now I'm going into hiding. Natuarl death? Being hunted and killed with a bow and arrow or shot is as natural as say being hunted down by a "natural" predator in the wild?

Scribe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Cattle are slaughtered with a captivated bolt gun, > Annette. Not with a bow and arrow, contrary to the > label you've attached. Oh well, that's alright then. :(