Absolutely a 1000% yes , we do want a Waitrose and one instead of the Co-op would be welcomed by many. Not that fussed about M&S to be honest, it's expensive ready meals that don't fill you up, though i would probably visit it. I guess there's a gap in the market for either a small Simply Food or a Waitrose Local. I've seen lots of discussion about the merits of a new supermarket in LL or E Dulwich in General. Several points to make. 1) The Co-op is awful. I would love to like it but its appallingly run & very overpriced for what you get. 2) The best option is to have the Co-op sell its lease to Waitrose or M&S rather than an altogether new supermarket being built. 3). I totally get the protests that Indy shops might suffer. However, i don't think the local specialist shops need to worry very much. Many of the visits to Waitrose will be from evening trade - none of the local shops are open by the time most people get home from work. Speciality products will still be bought. At the moment i actively avoid the Co-op in Lordship Lane ( I am an SE24 resident). If it was a Waitrose it would definately make my visits to Lordship Lane more frequent - more footfall = better for all shops. however : 4. Catchment & demand. Is it there? There is a well off local population but is it big enough? Dulwich Village is posh , sure, but i think there are only about 10,000 people living in SE21 - hardly enough to sustain a large waitrose - and only a proportion of the people who live in SE23 and SE24 would visit such a store. The core catchment area might not be big enough to sustain a large Waitrose - it's different to Clapham Junction, Fulham, or Gloucester Road, or Earls Court, where there are streets and streets of densely populated unbroken ABC1 demographic. This is perhaps the most important factor which will decide whether we get an "upmarket" supermarket. I personally am very much favour of a Waitrose in place of the Co-op but i wonder whether "4" above may weigh against it.