KD

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > its a "pact" Thank you

Due to popular demand, this thread appears to be once again in play. Just prior to the election I predicted. Re: I say no to Lib-dem Posted by: KD May 04, 10:43PM katie1997 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > .......and no doubt there will be another election > fairly soon after this one anyway. Oh joy. ======================================== I think your right, My bets on Conservative & Lib-Dem pact for 12 to 18 months then when that doesn?t work Conservative back in by default. KD Given all the propaganda work that Lib-Dems put in, during the lead up, they still lose 5 seats, or should we put that down to boundary changes. New prediction: There will be a Conservative and Lib-Dem pact, this will break down when Mr. Clegg does one of his hissy-fit Feb 2008 walkouts. Conservatives and labour will have the money to run another campaign; Lib-Dems will not have the money. Southwark now under labour control. Please wakeup and smell the coffee. Conservatives, first Labour, second Lib-Dems, third Daaaaaaaaa.

Santerme Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Please do not let this thread be over.... > > It's almost as good as discussing with my friend > in Tucson about his state's new statute on > immigration Don?t worry there will be a sequel, very soon.

Should not be long now, just wait for Nick Clegg to do one of his hissy-fit Feb 2008 walkouts.

So the liberals have lost control. Period.

News flash Old lady seriously injured when yet another Lib-Dem propaganda leaflet cam through her door ? the pile of Lib-Dem literature got so high it became unstable and collapsed on to the pensioner.

One finds ones square plates most suitable for the servants to carry, and I am told by staff below stairs, much easier to wash too.

I totally agreed with green ranger. And very well put too.

cool

au revoir, until next election. - Shouldn?t be long now.

Huguenot Wrote: Ranted------------------------------------------------------- > Closing Statement. > > Kevin Donnelly you've posted noxious politically > motivated unsubstantiated smears. > > You've insulted hardworking local politicians who > tried to look after you even though you're not in > their ward. > > You've insulted everyone on this forum in the > pursuit of your vendetta. > > You're to stupid to realise that the LDs are now > the most influential party in the hung > parliament. > > Having done this you're wandering off like a > mongrel who shat on your own doorstep. > > You are in short, an idiot. > > Thank you, > > HN ================================================== Great way to influence policy, lose five seats. Nice one. Touch of sour grapes me thinks.

Closing statement: If I have offended anyone during the course of this thread, I unreservedly apologise, especially about the ?real people of East Dulwich? comment. This is no excuse, but I had seen people being bullied on this site, for asking innocent questions. One person posted, asking about tactical voting and one of the first responses to this post was an attack ?libdem brainwashing conspiracy?? the original posting person gave a graceful rebuttal and duly left, not to return. Thank you, KD

bazinga!!!

Anyway back to the thread. If Leb-Dem councilors do not respond to emails and letters and in some cases delete emails all together without reading first. Why should people vote for Leb-Dems to run central government, if they are not going to listen locally why would they listen nationally Your vote is between you and the ballot box, make your own mind up, this is just an opinion. KD

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why don?t you and ruffers get a room. > > Cool. Nice to see the new local nutter is not > going to be a one-thread wonder. Stick around Kev > - you're entertaining, if nothing else. > > Hang on a moment - is this *really* KD? First, > not slavishly haunting his own thread and then he > comes on here and forms a complete sentence, > properly spelt and punctuated. I smell a rat! > > Oh, hang on... the question mark missing. It's > KD. Phew. ===================================================== I see you like quoting out of context as well, so for the rest of the reader. Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That's brilliant ruffers. I think it truly got to > the very spirit of this OP with the awesome: > > COULD NICK CLEGG TURN COMMON SENSE AND DECENCY > GAY? Why don?t you and ruffers get a room.

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That's brilliant ruffers. I think it truly got to > the very spirit of this OP with the awesome: > > COULD NICK CLEGG TURN COMMON SENSE AND DECENCY > GAY? Why don?t you and ruffers get a room.

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think so. There is no other logical conclusion. > Mind you, logic was never a highlight of this > thread, right from the off. > > On the other hand, KD's playground taunts are > classics in their own right. Some of them I've > not heard for decades! ======================================== Lets face it logic has never been your tour de force, I also see your still steeling my lines and trying to make them your own, still mimicry is a form of flattery, so I suppose I should thank you.

Andystar Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > So was this whole thread engineered to make me > feel sympathetic & vote Lib Dem?? ================================== Good question, But that?s between you and the ballot-box

Ladymuck Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Come on KD - don't slow down now... > > I haven't done this in a while, but I'm absolutely > pissing myself laughing!!! > > Thank you SO much > > ha ha ha ha ha > > Oh my Lord!... > > This is the Thread of The Year - fabulous! > > For you KD...please take it...I insist... > >> > Oh, such joy. ========================================== You have just demonstrated why people should not abuse drugs and alcohol, whist using a computer. You are clearly over stimulated. Might be time for you to have a little lay-down. KD

Re: I say no to Lib-dem Posted by: Keef Today, 05:17PM Also, on your second post of this thread, you very cleverly called Huguenot "huge nought" because he disagreed with you, so one could argue that you started the agressive bullying behaviour. Re: I say no to Lib-dem Posted by: KD Today, 05:23PM Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Also, on your second post of this thread, you very > cleverly called Huguenot "huge nought" because he > disagreed with you, so one could argue that you > started the agressive bullying behaviour. Hidden (but registered users can send me a message) Real Name: Huge Nought Posts: 3,086 Date Registered: 06/11/2006 16:49 Last Activity: 05/05/2010 15:29 View all posts by Huguenot *absolutely chokes from excessive laughter* Well, well - KD, you are truly wasted - I honestly haven't laughed this much for about a week (when I found myself piggy-backed on another forumite in the gents attempting to dry my wet jeans under the hand-dryers). I list my real name as Esmerelda Fatima Billington-Jones. It means sweet FA!!!!! Email: Hidden (but registered users can send me a message) Real Name: Esmerelda Fatima Billington-Jones Posts: 2,790 Date Registered: 22/02/2009 12:38 *collapses completely as a result of uncontrolled laughter* ========================================== Try keep up

Mark Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is this Huguenot chap a real East Dulwich person? Just correcting someone else?s mistake

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Also, on your second post of this thread, you very > cleverly called Huguenot "huge nought" because he > disagreed with you, so one could argue that you > started the agressive bullying behaviour. Hidden (but registered users can send me a message) Real Name: Huge Nought Posts: 3,086 Date Registered: 06/11/2006 16:49 Last Activity: 05/05/2010 15:29 View all posts by Huguenot

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Out of intrest, what is a "real person of East > Dulwich"? I can tell you what their not, their not school yard bullies. I have watched this site for about two and a half years and I have seen gross bulling of people for asking the most innocent of questions.

Mark Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KD, when were you appointed the voice of the > People's front real people of East Dulwich? About the same time you last walked on water.

As the 6th draws closer, I see the dogs of war are circling. And before you go off on one of your pathetic delusional rank about paranoia, I would like to take this opportunity to thank every one for playing; I could not have kept this thread so high in this lounge room, without your help. Without your devastating quips this thread would have surely fallen to the depths of obscurity. By the way ?devastating? that?s me being sarcastic. You really have not got an original concept among you. You cannot properly critique work, so you shout at it like thugs. So go ahead have your little tent on goose green on fair day, and look down your noises at the real people of East Dulwich, the real people of East Dulwich don?t think much of you. Let the ranting begin. KD. Thank you