ImpetuousVrouw

Not too bad on the pavements in my wellies. But they have good tread on them.

That's why iKm happy to defer to the masterstater, Hugo. Not my strong point you see. It's a bit early for the pub tho Hugs, you need to fix your world clock dearie.

Just saw 197 both directions and 176 towards Forest Hill by Dulwich Library.

We are all interested. Go and find some statistics, there's a love!

Maybe I should have put a smiley!

OK I have over egged it - I confess, but I can't get any better stats - see what you can find: http://www.iub.edu/~kinsey/resources/FAQ.html#orgasm

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sorry, but earlier you said > > The fact that the majority of women have never > experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly > discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in > my opinion. > > Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how > that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've > just posted. Yes, sorry, maybe I should have said a large minority of women have not experienced an orgasm. I think it used to be a majority in the dim and distant past, but seems that things have improved somewhat. Only 64% of women having orgasms is not good though.

Statistics for you Hugo: 75% of men and 29% of women always have orgasms with their partner (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, Michaels, 1994). About 85% of men report that their partner had an orgasm at the most recent sexual event; this compares to the 64% of women who report having had an orgasm at their most recent sexual event. (A difference that is too large to be accounted for by some of the men having had male partners at their most recent event.) (NSSHB, 2010.) Hugo - is your wife one of the ones who fake it??

The fact that the majority of women have never experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in my opinion. Whenever sex is discussed, however, you will always get the tittery or vulgar reaction from some, but that is not a reason to stop discussion. When people become more comfortable with talking about women's sexuality, there might be less of that kind of thing.

We are not animal lovers in the literal sense Busterbill!

Glad to hear it. I hope in future, if they have evidence of a crime being committed in their shop they give that evidence to the police and let them do their job.

Banning them from their premises is proportionate, sticking a picture of someone on their window and calling them a thief is not.

But we have handed the monopoly of violence to the state in the expectation they regulate the relationships betwenn citizens. If we want to take that role back, then we would have to put up with far more gangsterism and control of communities by the powerful. If we want to continue to allow the state to control punishment and crime, then we need to ensure the police are properly funded and trained and allow them to do their job. You seem to be advocating something in between, where someone with access to a shop window can abuse their position in the community to bypass the normal checks and balances of the judicial system to take on the role of judge, jury and executioner. You may think that being accused of a crime and having your picture displayed on a window is not punishment, but I disagree. How many people would not consider that to be degrading and humiliating if it happened to them?

Sorry. Yes we can't have young people learning about squirty orgasms and good sex. Drugs, violent crime and clowns are far better material for young minds in my opinion.

How about this bit: ARTICLE 6 1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgement shall be pronounced publicly by the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice. 2. Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. 3. Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: * (a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him; * (b) to have adequate time and the facilities for the preparation of his defence; * © to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require; * (d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; * (e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.

exercise sex chocolate getting hammered getting paid holidays staying in bed all day and failing all else, Prozac

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Im up for more information. Cant wait. I'm sure no-one one here wants me to go on about my squirty orgasms and favourite positions, do they?

On a serious note, I have a rabbit and found the pointy clit bits too stiff and irritating if I was trying to get my gspot with the big main bit, so I cut off the stupid clit extention bits. It was just spiky and uncomfortable. I think the clit bit is just a gimick myself as it was better without it. I have a few other toys, but they are getting a bit dusty as I prefer to masturbate using my fingers. Yes Karter, loads of women wank when they are in relationships. I especially like having my tits sucked by my partner when I'm having a strum.

I'm not. So can we ask the Inland Revenue to start publishing pictures of everyone who evades their tax or sticks it in offshore tax havens? If we are going for public exposure, let's not just concentrate on the vulnerable.

Je ne sais pas!

I have a snow boarding helmet and it has an inner cloth bit that I can remove and wash so it doesn't get too stinky. I even wash my anti-pollution face mask!

I don't understand why people get so excited about a bunch of rich, priviliged people spending our money on their over indulgent wedding and perpetuating elitism.

Maybe the people who don't wash their gloves don't get the runny nose that some of us do! If I didn't wash mine they'd end up pretty crusty!

Each country is a group of individuals.

Gross!