edcam

TopTree Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Edcam ? Hope you never complain about > cooperation?s not paying TAX then. Do you know the > registration process of the Big Issue or do you > know the owner and his background? This is beside the point. Your suggestion is still patronising and out of order.

TopTree Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Before giving ? Please ask - are you on benefits > including housing and while here ?are you looking > for work. No, because that's none of our business. As long as they have the appropriate I.D. then that should be enough.

Foxy said "going down" he-he, he-he, he-he.....

It's a terrible painting.

Is this about catflaps?

womanofdulwich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > err it was in the first post? ;) I missed that. How could I miss ramekin?!

How has this thread got this far without anyone saying the word "ramekin"?

I'm going from really liking Homeland to finding it tiresome and back again. Although I do like Claire Danes, her "I have mental health issues so I'm going to roll my eyes a lot" schtick is rather wearing. The Killing was fantastic, as was The Bridge. I LOVED Damages season 1 & 3 and we are still very into The Good Wife.

Waitrose have contacted the forum to say that any mention of them, positive OR negative, will result in immediate action, removing all organic produce from SE22.

Is this about double buggies?

An Otta is not just for Christmas you know.

Otta - stop talking about it. You're ruining lives. Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I love it when people get all upset and say things > like "Oh, so am I not allowed to talk about > something". > > Talk about whatever you like, and respect the > right of everyone else to tell you they think > you're talking shite. As long as they are not rude > to you / swear at you / call you names, they have > every right to disagree with your opinion. > > I haven't actually noticed all the previous cat > threads, probably because I am not the least bit > interested. This one got my attention because it's > in the lounge, and it was the getting rid of the > cat because little girl is demanding a dog that > made me click on it.

Hey - there's someone over in another thread talking about M&S again, more posts about The Cherry Tree and even someone with the temerity to recommend ANOTHER plumber! Bastards.

Yes, I would find it helpful to have a list of new "acceptable" topics. Perhaps Admin (or one of the forum police above) could pin the list at the top of the page? It's a potential deathrap here (done in Lynn Faulds-Wood "Watchdog" voice.)

I'm not sure everyone agrees with you chillaxed. Chillaxed Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You're allowed an opinion on anything and > everything. And you can express that opinion on > this forum. And other users can rebutt or take > the p*ss out of your opinion as they see fit.

Ah I see. People are only allowed an opinion about categories above a certain level - so far we have paedophile celebrities and corpses lying in the street. Can someone enlighten me about what is acceptable in terms of being able to have an opinion. For example, I assume it is ok to have feeling about mass murder but is a simple mugging disallowed? If not then does it have to involve physical violence? Is it ok to talk about burglary but not about fraud? The rules here are somewhat unclear.

You're clogging up the forum with your unwanted critique of others' posts. Please desist. Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think woodrot's point is that we've had a > disproportionate number of threads similar to > this. > > Should pet owners should be more responsible? Yes. > Does the subject warrant the number (and > intensity) of debates we've had on these pages? No > way.

If that is the case then she's a rubbish mother. Just saying :) Chillaxed Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Maybe Sabrina loves the cat and is reluctantly > selling her because her super-demanding daughter > insists on getting a dog. Maybe the exclamation > mark signifies exasperation and a Mum at the end > of her tether. So not selfish then. Just saying.

I'm not sure you are reading the thread properly. woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The point has been missed - threads like this have > little to do with the animal itself or even the > ethics of pet keeping on a holistic level.

The point is (re this thread) that if you think pets are disposable creatures (i.e. I'm bored with my cat, so I'm going to get rid of it and get a dog) then you are an idiot who shouldn't be keeping pets. Simple really. I don't need to take your pyscological (sic) test to know that. woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > How can the topic of animals being sold/ given > away generate such vitriol on such a regular basis > ? There is less hate on the Various Jimmy Saville > paedogeddon threads than for animals being moved > on. > > The levels of monothought idiocy I see on here > reminds me of those dark days when I came into > prolonged contact with ALF poltroons - and thats > hardly complimentary. > > Heres a basic pyscological test > > Which of the following sums up your outlook ? > > a) the small picture > > b) the big picture > > c) Kittens

Well she obviously is. Her daughter will turn out to be one as well. woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Im sure Sabrina is happy that she is now tagged as > a selfish cow >

People like this should be banned from owning pets.

If you've seen the van presumably you have taken the registration number down and told the police? If not then why not? It's really not helpful to state a nationality unless you're sure. I find it odd that you'd go for Kosovan unless you know.

I love that line and it doesn't seem to suffer from any worse delays than any other.

civilservant Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > so sorry, AM, deadly serious, no joke - but then > dry cleaning bills never are, are they? a joke, I > mean I know - too many of these incidents would put someone's bank balance in the red - geddit?!