"I note the "bigger is better" suggested criterion for why the Brixton arcades have been listed and why Station Arcade has not been lisited. Unless there is a simliar building elsewhere then Station Arcade is the sole survivor of its type. The railway station received its listing on 31 January 2008. "Squat" is an interesting verb to use. I know that there is an argument for the destruction of our architectural heritage when it is inconvenient and in the way, even if it is a unique building." Peckham's Station Arcade may be the sole survivor of its type, and therefore unique, but that in itself does not make it worthy of being preserved, imo. The Brixton Arcades are bigger but that's not the only thing they had going for them. My previous post was written in haste. When I came to live in Brixton in 92, the Arcades were already pretty run down and spent several more years getting progressively more so. However, even at their most unloved, they had a presence, a sense of potential, that Station Arcade lacks. Squat was used with reference to something sitting on its knees. But perhaps I'm being unfair and it isn't really a toad of a building. Perhaps if the plans for the Station don't go ahead, the Arcade will live up to your estimation and transform itself into a worthy alternative centre of focus for Rye Lane. Perhaps not. Therein squats the toad.