Distressing all round, je-suis concerned, do you think some of the anger that rightly should be directed at Fa Richardson has been redirected to the diocise? 1. Presumably nothing could be made public before charge, and even then care needed not to prejudice criminal process. 2. Letter states actions were overseen by the C of E national body for safeguarding. 3. You may be right in thinking the Church could have said more following his death, can you find any examples of cases where the 'employer' has made a statement prior to inquest unless the service users have been involved in the enquiry? 4. There are probably many users of child abuse images and sexual offenders, caught or not, living in E.D. I read Police are only persuing people in public positions from this sting!