lozzyloz

I do. Thanks for asking.

Apparently it's illegal to be in possession of a 16 year old boy from Norwood. This Is Local London Journalist from Southwark Life perhaps?

I'm reminded of the tragic case a few years ago of a 7 year old girl who was following her dads car on a quad bike. OK slightly different circumstances but the point is it was essentially putting the child in danger at an age when she probably wasn't fully aware of the dangers. It wasn't her fault nor the driver that killed her. I think the father might have been convicted but in the end everyone involved paid a terrible price. I'd like to let my 4 year old ride on the road with me close by but there's no way I'm doing that in London. I often let him ride on the pavement (he hasn't maimed or killed anyone yet) while I cycle next to him on the road. But even that can be dangerous as I try to be aware of traffic and keep an eye on him. I wish our roads were more suited for everyone to be able to use them safely and that people were better educated to respect the safety of others.

Isn't that a bit of a contradiction? You want the law to protect you but you're not prepared to uphold it yourself? Isn't there a difference between intent and negligence or carelessness? TBH If I'd encountered as many near death experiences as you (touch wood I haven't yet) I'd give up and get myself an Oyster card.

Lenk, if you're serious, I don't think that promotes the case for cyclists. Inciting a chase from a car (Oz driver or not) is surely just encouraging an accident which could involve other innocent parties let alone yourself. If I get cut up, 9 times out of 10 I'll catch up to the offender in traffic and simply ask them to explain their actions. They might not admit to being in the wrong but they will think twice next time they see a cyclist.

Sounds like a fair system at the Herne since it takes more than front of house to serve up a positive dining experience. I hope it excludes management, who you'd expect to be on higher wages and a profit/turnover related incentive.

Saw Eddie at the Lyric and .

Nice bit of visual creativity. Music's not bad either.

For those in the want but not with O2 you can buy an unlocked one here for a not unsubstantial fee.

Hear hear CitizenED. James is committed and I'd say pretty passionate about what he produces. It's a full on business to run but I respect the fact that he likes to have a bit of a life too. Don't think he's chasing the money and certainly not short of customers.

Is it safe to go out yet? *twitches curtain*

Is this like one of those messages you read on a forum and then next day there's another Columbine and everyone says we should've picked up on it?

With this British weather I can't remember the last time I had a nibble in a sunlit meadow! Excuse the pun but it's horses for courses. Butchers or not, people shop according to taste, budget and location. The important bit to remember is that at least we're not restricted to the big four supermarket chains, but have a few independents out there (like them or not) with a variety of products you wont find in a Denmark Hill chiller.

I saw lots of people BBQing in the sun there yesterday.

Are you the Patron Saint of nice restaurants? This is such a playground comment. What was the point of mentioning it if you're not going to share? Or maybe you're right? The Italian on the other thread started off with all glowing comments now it's slowly becoming burnt, soggy pizza and moody waitress. Customers eh? They ruin everything, nothing to do with the restaurant.

How weird is that! Mrs LL with our boys and a friend are in the photo.

Snorks, I mean blah, you had me rotfl. Try this out for pure comedy genius, but if you're looking for a real belly laugh then you can't go wrong here. Jx2, you could be onto something.

So innocent victim just like those in Hiroshima. Your logic is flawed.

So where do you draw the line? Suspect terrorist is tortured. Torturer goes too far and kills them. Finds out later they were innocent. Lots of pain no gain. Acceptable?

Jx2, your context was we tortured people in WW2 to extract information that 'saved lives' and that was ok. So using your same logic, by dropping a couple of nukes and killing thousands to end the Pacific campaign would also be acceptable? Perhaps dropping an H bomb over Afghanistan would save us having to torture terrorists and end the heroin trade as a bonus. Acceptable?

Along with genocide, ethnic cleansing, capital punishment etc. All necessary evils?

Review of Ganapati here. Not to everyones's taste.

Road users . . .

My 3 year old the other day. "Mum, can I have a ham sandwich? With ham in it."

The Architects' Website