katie1997

woody549 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think it's satay bar your thinking about > Frank... The Satay Bar?! I don't think it was particularly bad (or good) for drugs. Wasn't there a mental club near the Dogstar called Club 414 or something like that? It was def there in the late-90s. The Dogstar tame by comparison.

Anyone want to talk about oral sex and tits whilst listening to jazz in the background? Or a cup of tea and a biscuit perhaps?

I have never been a smoker and a small fraction of the people I know are. Some are bitter. Some aren't. Some non-smokers are bitter. Some aren't. Btw, I don't agree that the world at large has wised up to the effects or if it has, this is not at all evident in some countries I have lived in. So on balance - and for our good health or that of the environment we live in - are patio heaters a good thing?

Actually, no, he doesn't. I blame myself for being stupid enough to vote for him/them.

Blame that tw@t Tony Blair. Ban smoking in pubs but still very happy to take their money, sod 'health' reasons eh?

Monica, this is a great idea and I'm sure will attract lots of local support. Happy to donate seeds/plants whatever towards the Physic Garden. Thanks.

Absolutely. This is the place for splenetic ramblings for some. When I said his 'mehod' I meant approaching local businesses seemingly without majority of local support as opposed to whether it was coercion or persuasion.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ridgley > > As someone who has lost my rag with Huguenot > myself, I understand the emotion but I can't see > why you are being so aggresive in this instance? > It just reads like someone telling someone else to > F off without good reason You can't see where WHO is being aggressive here?! This really hits the top of my most incredulous post of the week award.

Alec John Moore Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "he wants to force you to fit in with him" could > be said of a number of posters on this thread from > both ends of the spectrum. Having met Tom I reckon > I could confidently say he has the courage of his > convictions and believes in his "cause". That > doesn't mean he is intolerant of others who don't > share his views. Could that be said of most of the > people who have posted on this thread? I don't necessarily agree with Tom's methods on this particular issue (eg directly lobbying local restaurants to stop serving something) but at least, as others have said, as he has felt strongly about an issue, he has at least got up off his arse to attempt to address it. As opposed to those who post on here who are seemingly very much intolerant - and distinctly unpleasant - of others that do not share their views (or rather their misguided idea of what others' views are). Fair enough, Tom could have perhaps been better off having targeted a campaign towards battery chickens but so could others who suggested it. I don't doubt that Tom welcomes all - whether vegetarian or not - to attend local meetings to discuss and put forward their views and opinions in person. I also think he has come across rather well (and very polite) in his manner and behaviour online in response to this understandably emotive topic/thread. Edited to add: sorry, long-winded way of saying that I agree with you here Alec.

Er...that's 11 words. Unless you meant 'up to 10 words' after 'Jazz is...'. In which case, you could add an extra POW! If you wanted to, that is.

Am I allowed to say 'gang activity'? Is it activity from 'leave it aaht, you muppet' style gangs? katie :-S Edited: with thanks to Northlondoner and D-C. Thought that was the case!

After reading the EDF, I often wonder why the area I used to live in had a cat population with an exceptionally good sense of direction.

Thanks Jah.

(Sorry Moos) But surely.... Trad jazz > the 'other' kinds that are REALLY irritating? The Mocklet = B)

to you

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > katie1997 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ... you don't post on the East Dulwich Forum > (or > > so it seems that way at times....speaking for > > myself at least) > > > Or, you have posted on the EDF more than anyone > else. > > Just thinking of that Keef bloke, remember him? > Loser. Okay, apart from that Keef* bloke, WHO is actually from around these parts that posts on here? * I remember. Not a loser, Otta! Keef = B)

... you don't post on the East Dulwich Forum (or so it seems that way at times....speaking for myself at least)

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > didn't have the hog roast last night (are the > meatwagon famous for them? since when?) so can't > comment but i did have the pulled pork for lunch > there and it was fantastic I hear what you're saying as think its their burgers (and onion rings?) that are renowned. But with a name like Meatwagon and its association with pretty darn fine meat, I'd expect the hog roast to be as good too. Was sadly underwhelmed by the burger I last had there. Cannot compare to how they used to be as only tried them at New Cross for the first time this year.

???? = B)

Loz = B)

HonaloochieB = B)

Hahaha "katienumbers opinion". My "opinion" consists of a yes and a no. Hopefully Mick will get it. Can't be arsed with bores on here. Go get a sense of humour. Do yourself a favour. Your posts are the biggest load of contrived yawn.

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oh numbers you've turned up. Heard you had > technical problems. You heard wrong then, please don't believe the assumptions of others. Yes, my laptop is fucked but I can still go online. Forgot how to turn on your > computer after another night on the piss. Glad to > see you've sobered up. Anyway, nominations have to > be seconded so you wont be seeing me stuck in here > all day thanks. WTF! I hope to god I won't be so bored that I spend all today reading this, quite frankly, crummy thread.

What a misleading title for a thread! Get in here Mr Medic - and drag that drinking-in-the-park LM with you for that thread of hers about the jocks whilst you're at it ;-)

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Following on from a debate in the Drawing Room > regarding the difficulties in the US on it's > ability to meet it's debt obligations.... > > Can a left wing or socialist minded government > ever solve a finanical crisis or get a country out > of a recession - Is there much precedent for this > ? No. > Or is there more precedent for a left wing > government taking the tax and spend approach that > leads to increasing debt. Yes.