Sue

Markyryan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > One should indicate. > > On a roundabout, one should indicate left coming > to their exit. If turning right (not continuing > straight through) - one should indicate too. > > GG roundabout requires a minimum of one use of the > indicator, or two if taking the second exit. Yes, but the point is that there are two roads very close together so it is not obvious which one a car is turning left into.

Lowlander Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Re signalling at the roundabout, if you want > to > > turn left towards the station, there is another > > road on the left immediately before the main > road > > (the one with the estate agent on the corner), > so > > signalling left could be confusing to others. > > > > I'm never sure quite what to do there, tbh. > > > > Normally I would signal left as soon as I was > past > > a point where there couldn't be confusion, but > > there is no space/time to do it in this case. > > I know what you mean. If I see someone signalling > left there , I assume they are either going down > Tintagel Road or through the roundabout and up > Grove Vale, and give them enough space to do > either. > > It's always safer to indicate than not to > indicate, as it shows other road users that you're > going to turn somewhere soon! Interesting. I'm not entirely sure about that in this case - I'd be interested to know what other people think.

Or Peckham Rye Park then Clock House or Ivy House depending on which end of the park you finish up?

Re signalling at the roundabout, if you want to turn left towards the station, there is another road on the left immediately before the main road (the one with the estate agent on the corner), so signalling left could be confusing to others. I'm never sure quite what to do there, tbh. Normally I would signal left as soon as I was past a point where there couldn't be confusion, but there is no space/time to do it in this case.

The OP was nearly two years ago, so I imagine it's all been done by now!

Don't know whether if was a BMW but some large shiny black car went through the red at a very high speed on the pedestrian crossing just past the top end of Underhill Road recently (near the Horniman) and I literally had to jump out of its way as I was already crossing. Shouting at it was pretty useless as by then it was well gone :(

The people who look after Peckham Rye Park. It's always a pleasure to walk through there. And the cheery Big Issue seller who is usually outside the larger hospice shop on a Saturday and tells you all about what's in the latest issue of the mag.

We may be able to do 9th.

The BBC Food site has lots of good recipes, including a brownie with salted caramel inside it which I intend to try out!

Grok Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Calm down.., I did not realise you have an > obsession with MM! it's just a coincidence. > Nice try.

Bic Basher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Can this thread be lounged again? It's become > even more ridiculous than the original post. The original post was not ridiculous.

Hendrix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thank you, appreciate the help, if anyone has 1st > hand experience dealing with this I'm all ears on > the best process... I know this is a serious issue, and I hope you can resolve it (I too would suggest the Southwark Noise Control route) but I did have to laugh when you said you were "all ears" ....

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I would not expect Sue to understand or agree with > me on any subject even if I said The Ivy House was > a great place > Sue would simply see DulwichFox and the Ivy House > and assume I was slagging it off. How ridiculous. Are you suggesting I respond to your posts without reading them? You do seem to post a lot of things I don't agree with, but I'm disagreeing with the content of your posts. It is not personal. Why do you need to turn it into something about you?

Louisa Wrote: ----------------------------------------- > > > Foxy I do agree the world has become P.C. mad, and > I'm sure in certain circumstances the use of > certain words is all about context and who is > using them. Not every single person using an > offensive word is knowingly being nasty about a > group of people. However, in this day and age, > with everything that has gone on and in the world > it would be incredibly naive for an individual who > is not part of any said minority, to then use a > phrase which has become synonymous with racism and > far right groups, and then hold their hands up and > say "not me guv", wouldn't you agree? If a > Pakistani friend of theirs was getting their > haircut in the barbers and they used the phrase to > him and everyone laughed it would be an entirely > different context, arguably. > > On the topic of Sue I do have to agree though, > every time I say or do anything these days Sue > seems to disagree with me for whatever reason. > Even when I'm being impassioned on a topic that > means something to me. The burger joint 'look at > me' thread being a perfect example of this. I dot > think she often agrees with me or you on anything. > I know it's all fun and games on the forum, but > just a genuine observation. Sue, would you like to > comment? > Yes I'll comment. My comment is that everybody can see what you, Fox and I have said on any thread on here. They can make their own minds up if they can be bothered. It's ridiculous to say that I would disagree with anybody for the sake of it, however it is true that some posters do seem to make quite frequent posts that I disagree with. That's got nothing to do with the person. It's got everything to do with the content of their posts. If you think otherwise, then do feel free to give some specific examples. Perhaps you could start a separate thread about how you think you and Fox are being "persecuted" just because you are you, rather than on the basis of your views as expressed on here. I don't think this thread is an appropriate place for it.

:))

lavender27 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > lavender27 Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Rational rage for certain "Tinnitus" > > > > > > Eh?! > > look it up I know what tinnitus is.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Let me try and make some sort of sense out of all > this.. > > Turkey relies on Tourism.. Travelers from all over > the world visit Turkey every year. > In the 30 years I have been traveling to Turkey I > have not come across blatent hostility with > foreign tourists. > I am not fluent in Turkish but can pick out most > of the 'vulgar' terms and words being spoken. > > But.. The Turks young and old seem to be obsessed > with big willies and (taking it up the batty.) as > the OP posted. > Any one who has travelled to Turkey or Greece > would of seen the statues in the Museums there. > > Talking about these things are a bit 'Rude' Like > small children here say ' Bum ' and giggle.. > > I do not think that the guys at Mems are being > intentionally Homophobic. > I have spoken to 100's of young Turkish waiters > many of which will be appauled at people using > offensive language in their bars. > > The reference to the Abreviated Pakistani word was > not about the Race but what they were supposedly > selling . > I do not think The staff at Mems were being > intentionally Racist. > > The Pills.. Turkey is awash with 'V iagra' I'm > not too sure if it is available over the Pharmacy > counter. > But there is 'Mock' V iagra everywhere.. In every > shop... market... > > https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5145/5649095039_7c3 > ab22570.jpg > > I think this whole thread needs to be re-assessed > and conclusions not jumped too. > I don't know what tourism in Turkey and the lack of hostility to tourists has to do with anything. We are talking about a barbers in East Dulwich. I don't know how you can possibly know whether they intended to be intentionally homophobic or not! Quite regardless of whether what you say about Turkey is generally true (and I've been to Turkey and didn't come across anything like that) if people are running a business in this country which involves face-to-face contact with customers, then they should be sensitive to how what they say is likely to be received. The statues in the museums are quite irrelevant. You find the same in Greece. Yes they sell replicas as a bit of fun for the tourists with smutty minds and a childish sense of humour, but that is a completely different issue. How you can possibly say that because of that, "Turks seem to be obsessed with big willies" is absolutely beyond me. And quite apart from the homophobic issues, you say "The reference to the Abbreviated Pakistani word was not about the race but what they were supposedly selling." Surely you must realise that talking about "Pakis in the street" is just not acceptable. Several people on this thread have said that they felt uncomfortable in that barbers. Are you suggesting that they should not have done?

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > monica Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > >first its > > rude to speak another language in front of > someone > > who does not speak the language > > Don't talk rubbish. It's not rubbish. It's quite clearly rude, and particularly when the other people are customers. A friend of mine once overheard herself being discussed by two complete strangers sitting near her on a train. They were somewhat taken aback when she spoke to them in the same (quite obscure) language.

lavender27 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rational rage for certain "Tinnitus" Eh?!

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > On one of the extremely few times I have ever > been > > to The Bishop, and some years back, my partner > and > > I were turfed out of our seats on the grounds > that > > one was reserved for the owner's dog (no > notice > > to that effect, of course). > > > > So I presume The Bishop must be dog friendly > > ...... > > > > ETA: It was a seat near the window. Maybe the > dog > > liked looking out of the window. > > > > Or maybe he wanted people to look in at him as > he > > sat in ...... trendy ..... @#$%& ....... etc > etc > > etc > > I don't get that at all.. > I was a regular at The Bishop. Clarance (The > Dog)would try and squeeze in on his favorite > window seat > But when Scott came in and called the dog he would > jump down. He was docile .. well behaved and was > loved by most people. Clarence never pesterd > diners for food. A gentle shove and he would get > down.. > > Who turfed you out.. ? > One of the bar staff. He definitely said the seat was required for the dog. We thought it very strange. As you would :))

Grok Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Morbid oddballs with a strange fascination for > real life criminal investigations eg Madeline > McCann case. If you are referring to me, which you are, I'm interested in liars and why they lie. I don't consider that particularly morbid. Having a psychology degree, I'm also interested in what makes some people so remarkably unpleasant on forums and in real life. Perhaps I'll start a research project. You can be my first subject. Except I don't think I could stomach it.

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > This place isn't in East Dulwich and I doubt > many > > users of this forum had even heard of it (I > hadnt) > > so I'm not sure why you are posting on here > > anyway? > > Really Susan of the parish, it's not that far from > the centre of middle earth. Follow up yonder and > straight up the dale, once past the dark lands you > come upon the Forest of the Hill. There, beyond > the gates of Horniman by a stretch and afore the > wheeled metal transport beast station, is Geddes. > > > Afore and over the track is the giant place that > holds many treats of the mouth and belly, > Sainsbo's > > Yes needeth to venture out moor, Squire Lady > Susan. > > *doffs cap* Hey, I could get used to that cap doffing 😀 It's true I don't go to Forest Hill very often, so if everybody else has heard of this hair salon, I take back my remarks!

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > This place isn't in East Dulwich and I doubt > many > > users of this forum had even heard of it (I > hadnt) > > so I'm not sure why you are posting on here > > anyway? > > Is the very much mentioned / recommended (by you) > Ivy House in East Dulwich.. ? :) > No but it's right next to Peckham Rye where many people walk their dogs, and my last mention of it was on that thread, I believe. And there have been several threads on here about it, due to its being London's first community owned pub against all the odds, and having won several awards since. And still doing well despite all the doom mongers, of whom you were one. I would suggest that mention of The Ivy House is somewhat different to a first time poster slagging off an obscure hair salon in Forest Hill!

On one of the extremely few times I have ever been to The Bishop, and some years back, my partner and I were turfed out of our seats on the grounds that one was reserved for the owner's dog (no notice to that effect, of course). So I presume The Bishop must be dog friendly ...... ETA: It was a seat near the window. Maybe the dog liked looking out of the window. Or maybe he wanted people to look in at him as he sat in ...... trendy ..... blow-ins ....... etc etc etc ETA: Oh! Apparently bl#w-ins is considered a rude word on here :))

Robert Poste's Child Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jah Lush Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Jam jars are for jam. > > Also good for holding tealights if you're eating > outside on a summer evening. Back to jam jars, I once actually bought (from the late lamented Grace and Favour, I think it was) two or three pretty little glass jars specifically sold for hanging up outside with tealights in. They looked lovely in the garden. For a while. But ..... As soon as the metal container bits of the tealights got hot at the bottom, all the jars shattered :(