
Heart108
Member-
Posts
87 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
@ Vote Them Out" IF you are too scared to identify yourselves by name - then you have zero credibility and no right to be taken seriously. At least those Labour Councillors you criticise are clear what they stand for and can be contacted by name. If you want to participate in a grownup political debate and lobby voters with pamphlets and a website then say who you are. You tactics are straight out of the Facebook/Vote Leave/Trump playbook - anonymous negative vitriol.
-
boomshake22 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks, it's worth doing the research, please feel > free to pass the letter on, yes the pcn says to > reply in writing on the pcn but the website states > you can submit online, much easier, again > misleading info on the pcn. > > Whatever convinced them to cancel my pcn,is > detailed in the letter, so it's an error on their > part that they are obviously not admitting, and as > far as I can tell not correcting. The Council do not have to give any reason for cancelling a PCN - cancellation from their side is 'discretionary'. It is therefore probably not worth going back to them after you have paid a fine and saying 'yes but someone else said ...' The only successful approach is to make a polite representation - as legally sound as possible - at the right time on your own behalf. The reason they make such a fortune is because most people are not experience, dogged, or informed enough to make representations in exactly the right way to get the PCN cancelled. This is all part of the approach set out by those in charge of generating income for the Council, combined with their legal team which will know very clearly what they can and cant get away with at the highest level. ie if someone were to take the legal process to the very end. That is where a judge would rule in favour of Boom - whose expert letter would have won the case, so it is a simple decision for Southwark to cancel such a powerful articulate representation with that kind of legal weight. Fairness and reasonableness has got nothing to do with it - look over at the thread of the Dulwich Forum on this and lots of people careworkers, parents not familiar with the area trying to drive their kids to the Herne Hill velodrome... all have been caught by the system. The press ought to be involved and challenge the Council to justify their rule making, and NAME who is responsible for conceiving and running this revenue generating scheme. Boom's letter has the imprimature of a barrister level specialised traffic legal expert - expertise like this is available for free on ( google Pepipoo Fightback forum) where the are a bunch of very very experience traffic solicitors peer reviewing and comparing each other's advice.
-
Judging by the lack of response to this question perhaps it is a sign that the Forum Admin would prefer not to encourage loads of traffic/questions etc because I have spent some time hunting around to see who to email and cannot find the answer I am researching how to start a community forum for musicians ( not based in East Dulwich! ) and would very much appreciate being able to contact someone experience of running this forum, if someone is willing to PM me, thanks.
-
@Bic Basher + tash b - thank you! .. this is the kind of helpful info I was looking for - let's see what else comes up
-
After years of using Virgin and paying nearly ?60 for "Phone ( I never use, Tivo + Fast Broadband" Package) I have got sick of the extortionate price and am looking at a letter just come through the door from BT "Superfast Fibre Broadband Unlimited" for ?29.99 a month including line rental. Since we have reluctantly not wanted to change our little used but still necessary BT landline (BT phone rental charge monthly is outrageously high)- are there any bright independent consumer opinions on this?
-
Who has blocked the flow of the River Peck in Peckham Park? And for what purpose? It' been silted for ages. Dogs can no longer play and drink by the fallen tree next to the childrens' playground.
-
Wasteful & pointless resurfacing of East Dulwich roads?
Heart108 replied to Heart108's topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
Heart108 Wrote: > And they are > replacing the short characterful granite pillars > that were there for decades For the record - I was wrong on the above: they have kept those granite pillars. I would appreciate a word from James Barber here... who was involved earlier in this thread a few years ago. Or any other Southwark officials with knowledge of what the costs of the Piermont Green work is and who commissioned it? -
Wasteful & pointless resurfacing of East Dulwich roads?
Heart108 replied to Heart108's topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
kford Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think it's good. Just waiting for Lyndhurst Way > to be done, so I don't get any more punctures on > my bike. Are you aware of the difference between useful and necessary resurfacing a busy road like Lyndhurst Way - compared with a luxury resurfacing job, replacing a perfectly serviceable hundred yard access road that is used by only 3 households And surrounded by grass on each side where kids play football etc ? This is literally a private driveway/ footpath that was used every day with no complaint. And they are replacing the short characterful granite pillars that were there for decades with dull boring characterless expensive blocks of big standard road lining. -
Wasteful & pointless resurfacing of East Dulwich roads?
Heart108 replied to Heart108's topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
Here we go again - end of the financial year and Southwark are obliged it seems to waste money on completely unnecessary and wasteful road expenditure ' in order to maintain the budgets'.. I defy any Southwark officials with knowledge of this to defend the nonsensically expensive work that is being carried out on the Piermont Green 'road' that serves 3/4 households ( see attached photo): 1 - Surprise surprise this work is being done at the end of the financial year 2 - Who authorised this expenditure? 3 - How much is the budget? I once spoke to a team making speed bumps in Friern Rd and back then it was ?4k per hump. I hate to think what the repair to Piermont Green must cost. 4 - Can anyone suggest what this money could have been spent on? 5 - Does anyone have knowledge of the deal or obligation that exists between Southwark and the contractors? 6 - I would like to know on what grounds this repair is being carried out/ This should all be public knowledge. I am personally outraged at the waste of money. -
I have just heard the following on good authority: In October last year a local person spent 3 days in hospital and had hand surgery after being bitten by a Malamute husky dog called 'Marlow' that is regular at Peckham Park. Since then the police had assured the person this dog would be muzzled and on a lead when it is out in Peckham Park, however the same person just encountered the owner 2 mornings running with the dog roaming free and unmuzzled. And the owner when challenged by the person who shouted abuse. Everyone should be very wary of this animal, who is transitioning from pup to full grown male and has the body power and jaws of a wolf. * * * Today I heard in the park from another dog owner that a husky was wandering around lost in the park close to the traffic and a teenage boy had tried to help find the owner. I've no idea if these two huskys are connected but certainly be on the lookout.
-
I heard a rumour that the Council is planning to install CCTV in Peckham Park by way of checking on dog owners and fining them if their dog is not on a leash etc? Is this just nonsense? What are the facts?
-
Today I was with my dog at the very spot that the pipe comes out of Peck Riverbank. Lo and behold a van Drives up with 'Drainage' emblazoned on the size. Contractors working on the site it seems? I asked them specifically about the pipe: they said it was absolutely nothing to worry about and that it was There to drain off excess water from the soil underneath the buildings and the surrounding area, Designed to improve the drainage of the land and make subsidence less likely
-
@gsweet87 - thanks! good tip
-
We have been using Virgin Media Broadband for more than a decade. Although it is getting better and better and more reliable ( SE22 near Peckham Rye) the service is vastly overpriced - I am sure they could provide it much cheaper. We have a package consisting of obligatory phone line with Virgin Number ( used to be for FAX but now never used and when it is connected we constantly got spam calls so just unplugged it). TiVo medium package ( which is very useful to be able to record programmes etc) and 100Gig broadband package which is mostly very reliable. I have kept a computer file since 2010 noting down every transaction, every outage and every problem - it also details the times when I get sick of paying so much money and threaten to move to another provider and they give me a little present of ?10 or ?25 pounds off my bill, and enough to keep me sweet and not actually take the risk of moving the whole lot over to another provider. Because I am self employed and rely utterly on a fast reliable broad band connection I dare not change, especially as we have the cable coming into the home. I have also found that when we have had a problem, Virgin Media have been outstanding at sorting it out and coming round, installing a new modem or whatever is needed to improve the system. The cost is between ?52 - ?56 per month. * * * I throw all this into the ring just to see how others feel about Virgin Media .. and one final thing though, which might be useful for people to know: when your broadband is down, and none of the modems in the home work, it is usually because they are repairing some major thing in the area. The problem is that they dont tell you .. and then your broadband is sticky or non functional and you dont know when it is going to back on. The technical number is 0800 052 0431 They will tell you if there is a problem .. but unless you ring you dont know. The other thing you wont be told unless you ring, is that once the technical problem is over, you need to switch off your modem and switch it back on again. But how would you know to do that unless someone had told you in the first place that the problem was fixed ? This means that you could be thinking it was out for days and in fact it had been fixed but you didnt know. So this means to be sure - when you have an outage, check with them by phone and once it is done try switching on and switching off. They often dont tell you that is what you need to do although it is on every recorded sound message
East Dulwich Forum
Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.