If anybody is thinking of writing to the council (you can email them too at licensing@southwark.gov.uk) this might be useful. I think the reasons for objecting on prevention of nuisance grounds are quite clear. However, you could also object on prevention of crime and disorder grounds. According to Metropolitan Police figures, reported crime in the two sub-wards at the north end of Lordship Lane, where the Adventure bar is situated, is dramatically higher than in any of the neighbouring sub-wards - as much as five times as high in some cases - and they are the only sub-wards where crime is on the rise. In sub-ward E01003953 the Metropolitan Police cited 19 notifiable incidents in May 2010, going up to 26 notifiable incidents in June 2010 the latest month for which figures are currently available. In sub-ward E01003952 there were 22 notifiable incidents in May, up to 23 in June. These figures are available on the Met Police's website - have a look on http://maps.met.police.uk/. Compare the two sub-wards with all the neighbouring ones and you'll see that there is a significant problem. Presumably extending the licensing hours of the Adventure bar - and encouraging the Boho bar to follow suit - would only make this worse.