
LordshipPain
Member-
Posts
36 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by LordshipPain
-
Coordinated posts intended to mould opinions and silence debate
LordshipPain replied to LordshipPain's topic in The Lounge
AI Agents. I have been getting into the weeds of them. Turns out they can be VERY good at finding out about posters and their patterns. This should be fun. -
The newly landscaped Dulwich Square
LordshipPain replied to Earl Aelfheah's topic in Roads & Transport
You don't. -
Coordinated posts intended to mould opinions and silence debate
LordshipPain replied to LordshipPain's topic in The Lounge
The number of posts or reactions you are allowed to make is not "free"; your speech is limited here. -
The newly landscaped Dulwich Square
LordshipPain replied to Earl Aelfheah's topic in Roads & Transport
Notice how those who claim they will wear their "Foe List" badges want you to know who they are? Its not a get together; its an ID parade to find those guilty of wrong think. -
Coordinated posts intended to mould opinions and silence debate
LordshipPain replied to LordshipPain's topic in The Lounge
I have been doing a lot of posts and liking a lot - to see if we are rate limited. It appears we are to some extent, with "likes". How do people manage to get into the mid 20,000's of posts on here? That is some commitment. -
I have not. Both things are true.
-
The newly landscaped Dulwich Square
LordshipPain replied to Earl Aelfheah's topic in Roads & Transport
Whilst I agree with you, it's only partial. That money - millions, I shudder to think - should have been spent improving the places with the most need which are frequently where the poorest live and who are the nearly-always victims of these luxury policies. The only reasons I can come up with are; to cause social division; to embarrass the people in the nice areas into compliance; to set up a them-and-us narrative. -
Coordinated posts intended to mould opinions and silence debate
LordshipPain replied to LordshipPain's topic in The Lounge
I have been thinking about it and what I have loosely come up with so far are sites and types. Sites Here, Comment is Free, the Independent, the BBC (difficult as their comments section is only ever on trivia), The Telegraph (less so but increasing), The times (rapidly increasing), New Statesman, Spectator (much less so but some increase) even the Daily Mail and UnHerd (perhaps even union platforms, agit-prop and "progressive" platforms, XR, "middle-East", Just Stop Oil, Reddit, Bluesky, Truth Social etc.) I am sure the AI will find more to cross-reference. Types Astro-turfers, single-issue obsessives (frequently overlap with Astro-turfers), floral enforcers, ideologues, political staff, hypocrites, luxury belief pushers, Igors and Renfields. The vast majority are; normal local residents a bit frustrated with something; those looking for a tradesman; or just the friendly saying hello and looking for a bit of community. -
Yes, this thread has got weird.
-
You are trying to cast doubt on what I have provided evidence for and I have to ask why? The rubbish wouldn't be scattered if the blue bags were collected on schedule. They are very frequently left in various places around East Dulwich.
-
Very decent of you. I accept and apologise to Penguin so as to keep "community relations" friendly.
-
I have been thinking about using an AI to cross-reference comments; between public commenting platforms along with the news of the day, for past events (that needed to be "dealt with" for narrative management), future events which need to be "shaped" or "nudged" to move the public in a particular direction (narrative control) and what it is that forms the "community". I think it is happening on a large number of comment forums. I can already see a pattern with a number of single-issue commenters (that have the nerve to accuse others of being "obsessed" or of being a member of certain political parties) that make feeble attempts to comment on other subjects but really have only one obsession. They are obvious. But I also want to see the patterns of enforcers and Igor / Renfield types.
-
Thank you for your reply.
-
It was around New Year 2023; I had walked my dog past the exact spot late that evening before it happened. There were a lot of cars in Straker's Road that night playing loud music. "Roadmen" Alice. We all know who they are but you are daring, through the use of public shaming and ostracism, people to declare something you already know. Tut tut Alice, white boys also affect a Roadman persona. There was a statistic I read on a council advert at a bus stop in Lambeth, it said "99% of young people in Lambeth have never been in trouble with the police". We all know 99% of the 1% are Roadmen so lets not pretend any further.
-
Is that your comment; people shouldn't overfill their bins? Nobody does. All those bins had lids closed. The problem is when they open them and the bin tips into the lorry and half a dozen pieces of litter fall to the floor. Are you actually denying photographic evidence?
-
The newly landscaped Dulwich Square
LordshipPain replied to Earl Aelfheah's topic in Roads & Transport
Luxury Square paid for by people living in poorer parts of the borough with their pockets and their health after having been gaslit by people like you. I, we, see you, all over this forum trying to nudge people, and then bully them into silence when they don't comply. -
Photos. Every single piece of litter in that photo (if you enlarge it you can see lots more pieces) was dropped by the bin men in the background. I don't blame them - it would destroy their backs to pick it all up. Perhaps they should try to not drop so much litter in the first place... These photos were taken on the 1st March - a Saturday. The street cleaner, who does an excellent job around Underhill Road and Melford Road, bags up the rubbish and leaves them on a Thursday generally. They are supposed to be collected the same day or the next day at the latest. They weren't collected. The first photo was November. It was a very large number of poo bags. I reported it to Southwark but they took 3 days to collect it. In the meantime the bags were squashed and the faeces was spread everywhere, photo 2. It would mean that everyone who walked along that bit of road will have spread it a bit further, along with the vehicles, so that it went into a lot of people's houses. Over to you Sue. In this photo you can see the litter that was dropped by the bin men (I feel bad as they are really nice and work really hard often going into people's properties to get the bins that weren't put out - usually at a semi-jog speed; it must be exhausting and its not their fault that Southwark doesn't give them enough time to do their job properly. Maybe they should sack their team of EDF astro-turfers to save some money?), the split blue bag with some birds sorting the contents on the pavement, and the refuse truck in the background. I don't blame the workers, I blame Southwark. I am also annoyed at you, Sue, for saying this is an exaggeration and is basically a lie; something you do all over the forum (along with the cycling trolls). I have a lot more pictures too.
-
No need to provoke you since you respond constantly to everything. It is not a gross exaggeration - I took photos. Do you not like people answering back? A bit head girl aren't you. Unkempt roads and weed-lifted pavements with dog faces bags all over the place - when the blue bags, which are regularly not collected by the LA, are split open by foxes. Again, I have photos.
-
The newly landscaped Dulwich Square
LordshipPain replied to Earl Aelfheah's topic in Roads & Transport
All this arguing about Luxury Square. -
A problem with weeds being left to grow on pavements is that a lot of local residents appear to think it gives them permission to litter which then accumulates around these tufts of urine-soaked weeds. Saying that, the principal litter louts are the recycling workers that do the blue bins. I followed them down one of the roads and at every single stop they dropped between 5 and 11 separate pieces of rubbish. There were hundreds of pieces dropped on Underhill Road alone.
-
Melbourne Grove South CPZ consultation
LordshipPain replied to first mate's topic in Roads & Transport
There are several astro-turfers on this forum - some are quite prolific in their dedication to their work. -
The newly landscaped Dulwich Square
LordshipPain replied to Earl Aelfheah's topic in Roads & Transport
Why is it called Dulwich Square? It should be called "Luxury Square". -
Melbourne Grove South CPZ consultation
LordshipPain replied to first mate's topic in Roads & Transport
Bad faith nonsense from someone that doesn't even live here. Go away and focus on your own neighbourhood. -
Noticeboard on Northcross Road
LordshipPain replied to Jellybeanz's topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
It's interesting how local businesses and the people that own / work in them are not considered part of the "community". The dictionary says "a group of people living in the same place" as the principal definition. Why are we forced to accept a secondary definition where those who don't live in social housing, the vast majority of people in East Dulwich, are told to shut up? -
If weeds are allowed to grow for too long they lift pavements and create obvious tripping hazards. Obviously removing them from your wall and/or garden is unacceptable.
East Dulwich Forum
Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.