I think the main culprit here is privitisation, not just the relocation of the sorting office. Relocation shouldnt really matter as long as travel time is accounted for but I suspect a few numbers were crunched during the move to sweep that allocation under the carpet. So you take an entire office, move it 10 minutes away from its initial location and add 20 minutes to every walk to account for return times also (perhaps im being a little generous on the tiimings here but you get the point). 3 or 4 walks adds an hour to the office so you can see it quickly adding up right? I strongly suspect they'd prefer to take hours OUT of the business rather than inject more into the office. I also strongly suspect they're not about to relocate again to a closer location regardelss of whether it would make a saving or not (it wont) so we need to move on from the relocation complaint. It's a 4+year old complaint and its got us all nowhere. Now I dont want to keep banging the drum on this but I really think our best bet is to look at these strikes properly. Several times within this thread (the annual thread) people have talked about unavoidable Royal Mail items, things you cant get in any other way. The strikes are not only for pay but mainly because the post force is being expected to deliver this stuff along side much more profitable items, in increasing volumes within tighter time constraints. In many cases they are even implementing planned overtime which basically means your mail is planned to fail in heavy periods unless you delivery person works over their time, regularly. This is nationwide. Bombarding the CEO with the knowledge that you havent received a letter or whatever isnt doing anything, theyre so many steps removed from the problem their response is just protocol. I believe the postal workers are already fighting for this to not get worse each year so we need to back them instead of coming on here and winding each other up annually. Royal mail needs better resourcing, less profit, tell the CEOs that