vladi

One month on and Never-Here-Keir is getting ever closer to the toaster. It seems that he goes AWOL at every opportunity. He's done 34 foreign trips to 26 countries since becoming PM. Surely, with all the in-fighting going on at #10 and with some MPs and one Labour mayor on manoeuvres, should he not be staying at home and fighting for his premiership and the interests of the Labour party? or does he reckon he is already doomed and feels better away from it all?

,

What s the root problem you refer to?

The key aim of this and future budget will be cuts to government spending.- not more taxation. The chancellor could start with drastically reducing the cost of the ever expanding Motability scheme. Motability has grown as use of the scheme has exploded by a third since 2017, with people qualifying for new cars for conditions including tennis elbow, ADHD and anxiety. (Probably some one with ADHD should not be driving a car!) Motability's has 860,000 users!!. They are also exempt from paying VAT or insurance premium tax on their leased vehicles. The cost to the tax payer is £3.1 Billion. Some Motability users get their cars totally free and the balance are subsidised. For a little extra, a user can opt for a BMW, Mercedes, Jaguar or anything else they fancy. Time to reign it in.

Both Labour and Conservatives can remove the threat of a Reform government by making making two major policy promises. And these are .......... (1) categorically state that they will take Britain out of the ECHR and (2) Undertake to remove any new small boat arrivals to Rwanda or wherever else. Reform is basically a single issue party and adopting (1) & (2) would send Reform into obscurity. The country has had enough of our judiciary making a gold-plated interpretation of the ECHR statutes.

Agreed, he should not be held accountable over the mess up over release of prisoners. On the other hand he did himself no favours with his gaffes on the BBC Master Mind programme where he passed on five questions. Where he did answer, here are some of his responses.... When asked who succeeded Henry VIII, Lammy incorrectly answered “Henry VII,” When asked which French scientist won Nobel prizes for both physics and chemistry?” Lammy responded with “Antoinette” When asked which fortress was built to defend Paris and later used as a prison, he answered “Versailles". When asked which variety of blue English cheese is often taken with port, he answered "Leicester" If nothing else he was entertaining.

It sounds like a horrendous situation and I truly sympathise. And to make it worse, he is probably handling other deceased estates in a similar manner. Given that (1) the main beneficiary is "the typical 'friend'" and (2) the main asset has diminished in value and continues to do so (3) he will be deducting fees then there may be be nor very much left at the end of it. That being the case, I would press the case against him through the Probate Registry. to have him passed over using a citation process.

I don't support Farage but let's clear any misunderstanding ; tax avoidance is not a crime whilst tax evasion is.

looking for about 5 metres of blue HDPE water pipe. Willing to pay.

Well, the tenant might care if there's a possibility of getting a refund of around £36,000 in rent. And the letting agent might care if they have to shell out that amount.

The issues going forward appear to be:- 1. Will the tenant demand a refund of the rent paid - as they are entitled to do? 2. Will Southwark impose a fine? 3. If there is a fine, who will pay it Landlord or letting agent? 4. Will Reeves' name appear on the Southwark rogue land land on-line register? 5. If the rent is forfeited, who pays it back to the tenant - LL or Letting Agent. This story will run for some time yet.

We are given to understand that she delegated the task of letting it out to an estate agent. This suggests it's the agent who is responsible.