Jump to content

geh

Member
  • Posts

    268
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Taken early hours of this morning 25.07.23 from central ED. any suspicious activity or other info please DM me. Long shot I know but thanks in advance. geh
  2. any updates on this topic please, good or bad? I have engaged an ED firm, who granted told me they would be slow, but........... I need a will before I die (of old age hopefully) thanks
  3. Apologies for my pedantry but in the same way Dulwich Hamlet is singular, it’s The Dulwich Estate, just the one. Sorry again.
  4. No independents are being threatened with the arrival of Poundland (replacing another chain Foxtons), and the increase in footfall will more than make up for any losses independents make. It’s competition, pure and simple. except when it comes to rent review time
  5. what's the cost/benefit, it would be useful if Southwark detailed the revenue raised. More useful still if that was directed/ring-fenced within Peckham Rye area, but I realise that's optimistic.
  6. ate in there last night, and delighted to confirm its as superb as ever!
  7. also, and more importantly Cauliflowear, why are you so vile?
  8. Cauliflowerear Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I used to think Johnnies but they seem to put up > their prices every month, pure greed, hopefully > they go out of business. can't imagine why they would be putting up their prices monthly now?
  9. 37 ED to Brixton, I used to use this all the time, can't face sitting on it now, and presumably when Herne Hill 'improvements' enacted it will be even slower. Two consequences, no spend directed to local Brixton Market, restaurants/bars, plus if going into town, more often or not get an uber - so that's not terrible good is it!
  10. Labour flyer through the door (Goose Green Ward) this week, appreciate that its not the full manifesto but no mention of LTN's - not exactly conviction politics is it? Nothing from the other parties (any of them). Not sure who is the least bad...
  11. In any other world taking money for a service when you have either no ability, or no intention of delivering that service is called fraud. So frustrating, and I have no confidence that anything currently in the sorting office will ever be delivered.
  12. absolutely lets do this, then we can all truly share the benefits EDAus Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ashbourne Grove has become the driveway to > Melbourne Grove South, we have had an increase in > traffic, speeding and pollution - all the multiple > cars, vans and delivery trucks. > > The residents of Ashbourne Grove were promised our > views and concerns would be considered when the > proposals were reviewed, this seemed fair as we > were the ones adversely affected. > > What happened? When Councillor Rose visited > Melbourne Grove South she was taken into a > pro-barrier house and other residents were stopped > from approaching her ? how is this is fair and > transparent? > > Low traffic neighbourhoods do work but not the way > they are being implemented in East Dulwich. > > If Melbourne Grove South want their barrier and > the council are serious about climate change and > active travel, they need to remove all the parking > between Tell and Ashbourne Grove. That section of > road should be reclaimed and made into a bike shed > and a community garden with a bike track through > it. Strangely that option has been soundly > rejected by the ?local? residents every time it > has been raised.
  13. LTN?s definitely altering my transport habits. I now never get the 37 to Brixton to then get the tube, too congested, too painful, too slow. What I have done is to make a conscious decision to only purchase pre 40 year old vehicles that are classed as classics and exempt from Ulez and Congestion charge. Someone once said for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction!
  14. eastdulwichhenry Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I received an update on plans from the council > today, and I opened it with some trepidation, > thinking they might decide to just scrap the whole > LTN based on the noisy objections like those we > see here, reversing the gains we've made in ease > of walking and cycling on Melbourne Grove/Calton > Avenue, but apparently it's even better news than > that, they've decided not to proceed with the > Melbourne Grove south reopening. If I understood > correctly, that's great news. Reopening that route > as a LL to EDG rat-run would have reversed some of > the fantastic gains that we've made due to the LTN > - in particular the ability to go from ED station > to the library along a largely traffic-free route. yup, great news, great for the businesses that have closed great for those that are suffering great news
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...