The Family Room Classifieds
Buy, sell, give away items related to family life (e.g. baby equipment, clothes, toys).
65,852 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 103 views
-
- 0 replies
- 121 views
-
- 0 replies
- 109 views
-
- 0 replies
- 126 views
-
- 0 replies
- 150 views
-
- 1 reply
- 253 views
-
- 0 replies
- 200 views
-
- 0 replies
- 119 views
-
- 1 reply
- 124 views
-
- 1 reply
- 176 views
-
- 0 replies
- 123 views
-
- 2 replies
- 392 views
-
- 0 replies
- 202 views
-
- 1 reply
- 261 views
-
- 0 replies
- 167 views
-
- 0 replies
- 169 views
-
- 0 replies
- 181 views
-
- 0 replies
- 195 views
-
- 0 replies
- 137 views
-
- 2 replies
- 349 views
-
- 0 replies
- 126 views
-
- 0 replies
- 101 views
-
- 3 replies
- 336 views
-
- 1 reply
- 196 views
-
- 1 reply
- 198 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Yep, I got it wrong, get the guillotine ready then......NOT. -
It's a few years since I last grappled with a Windows installation, but I don't recall ever having done any apparent harm by using a Windows installation or recovery drive for repair purposes, and it can be effective. Reinstalling the boot manager software shouldn't be a big or precarious deal for it. It's already identified the problem and knows how to repair itself. -
But has it been established that poor sewerage infrastructure can be a cause of flooding, for which legal responsibility could then be rightly attributed to a water company?
-
By Earl Aelfheah · Posted
They're not. But the work to build bunds which hold significant amounts of water in Dulwich and more recently Peckham Rye parks, was undertaken to mitigate the impacts of poor drainage and sewerage infrastructure (which was under invested in for years) causing flooding to properties. The latter is (as I understand it) the responsibility of the water companies. I believe taxpayers have paid for the underinvestment in infrastructure by the water companies in two ways; firstly, by paying to have the changes made to the parks (I never got a clear answer from Renata on this forum when I asked, but think this is the case); and secondly through the loss of amenity those schemes inevitably create when those parks are waterlogged through the winter months. As I said, privatised profits, socialised costs.
-