Jump to content

The Family Room Classifieds

Buy, sell, give away items related to family life (e.g. baby equipment, clothes, toys).


65,863 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 117 views
    • 1 reply
    • 182 views
    • 0 replies
    • 143 views
    • 0 replies
    • 168 views
    • 0 replies
    • 118 views
    • 0 replies
    • 115 views
    • 0 replies
    • 114 views
    • 2 replies
    • 214 views
    • 2 replies
    • 276 views
    • 1 reply
    • 165 views
    • 0 replies
    • 106 views
    • 0 replies
    • 111 views
  1. Baby girl gift set 3-6 months

    • 0 replies
    • 98 views
    • 1 reply
    • 185 views
    • 0 replies
    • 99 views
    • 1 reply
    • 112 views
    • 0 replies
    • 113 views
    • 0 replies
    • 91 views
  2. Looking for a job.

    • 0 replies
    • 201 views
  3. Looking for a SURFSKATE.

    • 0 replies
    • 137 views
    • 3 replies
    • 187 views
  4. Brand new bunny wall art

    • 4 replies
    • 433 views
  5. Free toucan boxes

    • 0 replies
    • 178 views
    • 0 replies
    • 156 views
    • 0 replies
    • 131 views
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think this story will run a bit - Labour HQ has said she went because "further details have come to light". Which is political speak for "what is about to come to light was not something we were aware of so don't blame us". i.e. casting her adrift politically and suggesting she did not tell them the full story to cover their own backs. Clearly the police must have thought something unusual was happening to charge her with that - we will probably find out over the weekend.   The problem is when you preach that "we're not like them" and then you act like them then it makes you look like hypocrites. In isolation this could be managed but it's another example of Labour saying one thing and doing another - Cash for Access, the clothing debacle, MP punching constituents etc etc etc. It casts all politicians in a bad light.
    • Now it can be true that it will be easy to find people who believe either of those things, that doesn't make both those things true  Objectively - a situation is handled very differently by two different governments. If some people decide to say "proof they are all the same" then we should be pointing out that that is wrong - not hand waving it away as something that people can choose to believe or not believe If the people who want to believe "they are all the same" have some better idea - eg Reform? - then they will have to have to explain how that party is packed with criminals so how does that improve things. "They are all the same" is usually code for "I don't really want to think about anything, I just want what I want" that, and whilst I find him infuriating in many matters, I can't see Starmer of all people reversing this decision. 
    • That was certainly par for the course under the previous Gov, but Labour has a lot of very keen/ambitious MPs so I think she'll probably have to wait her turn...
    • What's the bet Louise Haigh will re-enter the cabinet at the next reshuffle?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...