Jump to content

The Family Room Classifieds

Buy, sell, give away items related to family life (e.g. baby equipment, clothes, toys).


67,774 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 222 views
    • 0 replies
    • 338 views
    • 0 replies
    • 276 views
    • 0 replies
    • 274 views
    • 1 reply
    • 301 views
    • 0 replies
    • 291 views
    • 3 replies
    • 787 views
    • 2 replies
    • 647 views
    • 1 reply
    • 421 views
    • 5 replies
    • 340 views
    • 0 replies
    • 359 views
  1. sold

    • 4 replies
    • 387 views
    • 0 replies
    • 267 views
    • 0 replies
    • 283 views
  2. Gro bags for sale

    • 0 replies
    • 328 views
    • 0 replies
    • 297 views
    • 0 replies
    • 270 views
    • 0 replies
    • 309 views
    • 0 replies
    • 386 views
  3. SOLD

    • 1 reply
    • 368 views
    • 0 replies
    • 314 views
    • 0 replies
    • 301 views
    • 0 replies
    • 295 views
    • 4 replies
    • 397 views
    • 0 replies
    • 335 views
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
    • I'm not sure that's true. I don't know how they bill (and I might be wrong) but I doubt they get paid each time they turn up at court and a witness or defendant fails to show, or the printer's broken, or  the loos have flooded, or whatever. I think most remaining criminal barristers and solicitors these days (now there's no money in it) genuinely care about the justice system and would like to see trials coming to court quicker, but not like this. Plus, I don't see how these measures will help - they won't suddenly magic up all the courtrooms the system demands (that prev govts shut down), and do we even have enough mags to pick up all the extra non jury cases that will arise? Picking and panelling juries isn't what's causing the delay in trials going to court.     
    • Well, this is it isn’t  it?    this does see to be an ongoing problem since oooh I’m gonna say 2016. For some reason  governments playing to a populist right wing media without foundations in reality, all in the hope of a supportive headline that will never come 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...