The Family Room Classifieds
Buy, sell, give away items related to family life (e.g. baby equipment, clothes, toys).
65,742 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 254 views
-
- 0 replies
- 313 views
-
- 0 replies
- 222 views
-
- 0 replies
- 257 views
-
- 0 replies
- 293 views
-
- 0 replies
- 258 views
-
- 0 replies
- 227 views
-
- 0 replies
- 385 views
-
- 0 replies
- 224 views
-
- 0 replies
- 258 views
-
- 2 replies
- 260 views
-
- 0 replies
- 327 views
-
- 0 replies
- 223 views
-
- 0 replies
- 245 views
-
- 3 replies
- 606 views
-
Drop off Kid's cooking and paint spin classes at Aya Captured On The Rye http://capturedontherye.com
- 0 replies
- 281 views
-
- 0 replies
- 320 views
-
- 0 replies
- 210 views
-
- 0 replies
- 99 views
-
- 0 replies
- 300 views
-
- 0 replies
- 212 views
-
- 0 replies
- 232 views
-
- 1 reply
- 333 views
-
- 0 replies
- 231 views
-
- 1 reply
- 288 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
PCSOs may not need specific qualifications, but they go through a reasonably rigorous recruitment process. Or at least they used to. It may have changed. -
The ones I've dropped into may be organised by PCSOs in the SNT but regular PCs have attended. They have actually been a cuppa with a copper, but not necessarily loads of them. -
@Pereira Neves "Cuppa with a Coppa" is a misrepresentation as PCSOs are not real police. They have no more powers of arrest that any public citizen. They may have the "authority" to advise the regular police of a crime - just like Joe Public. One exception is that they can issue fixed penalty notices to people who cycle on a footpath. We see people cycling on the footpath every day but have never seen a PCSO issue a fixed penalty notice to anybody. No qualifications are needed to become a PCSO. At best, all they do is reassure and advise the public with platitudes. -
Right. Already too many people saying “labour pushed for longer and more stringent lockdowns” which if nothing else, does seem to give credence the notion that yes people can be brainwashed Nothing ... Nothing Labour pushed for was about longer lockdowns. Explicitly, and very clearly they said “lock down early OR we will be locking down for longer “ ie they were trying to prevent the longer lockdowns we had But “positive thinking” and “nothing to see here” from Johnson led to bigger problems as for the hand-wavery about the economic inheritance and markets being spooked by labour budget - look - things did get really really and under last government and they tried to hide it. So when someone tries to address it, no one is going to be happy. But pretending all was tickety boo is a child’s response
-