Property
If you are looking to rent, buy or sell a property in the local area, post about it here.
6,768 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 474 views
-
- 0 replies
- 414 views
-
- 0 replies
- 610 views
-
- 0 replies
- 498 views
-
- 0 replies
- 445 views
-
- 0 replies
- 403 views
-
- 0 replies
- 381 views
-
- 2 replies
- 909 views
-
- 0 replies
- 424 views
-
- 0 replies
- 388 views
-
- 0 replies
- 476 views
-
- 0 replies
- 341 views
-
- 0 replies
- 513 views
-
- 0 replies
- 353 views
-
- 0 replies
- 446 views
-
- 0 replies
- 264 views
-
- 0 replies
- 328 views
-
- 0 replies
- 546 views
-
- 0 replies
- 286 views
-
- 0 replies
- 322 views
-
- 0 replies
- 397 views
-
- 0 replies
- 312 views
-
- 1 reply
- 554 views
-
- 2 replies
- 529 views
-
- 0 replies
- 273 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
But the bulk of the build is for student accommodation, with just 'some' affordable housing which will, if history is anything to go by, become much less once the scheme is started. Southwark has, I believe, quite a number of empty properties which are not in use. The number of people on Southwark's waiting list is frankly irrelevant to this scheme, which won't touch the surface. This isn't 'new housing' which is visible, but commercially profitable student bedsits (at least, the developers hope it will be commercially profitable). -
-
Does anyone know if Tommy Rooney is away? I have a boiler emergency and he isn't responding to messages. I don't really want to use someone I don't know, and I know Tommy is excellent! -
By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted
Sounds like Southwark needs to build some social housing and the Dulwich Society needs to stop objecting because new housing is "visible". But if people were really concerned about housing costs, they'd be in favour of increasing the supply of housing to a growing population. "In favour of development so long as it's low volume social housing paid for by the private sector" is really just austerity NIMBYism with a mask on.
-