The Lounge
The place to relax and chat about anything.
22,484 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 583 views
-
- 10 replies
- 360 views
-
- 26 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 38 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 502 views
-
- 2 replies
- 553 views
-
- 2 replies
- 776 views
-
- 9 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 5 replies
- 845 views
-
- 10 replies
- 879 views
-
- 1.3k replies
- 160.6k views
-
- 18 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 929 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 589 views
-
- 2 replies
- 701 views
-
- 4 replies
- 919 views
-
- 69 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 39 replies
- 1.9k views
-
- 20 replies
- 1k views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
I think it's connected with the totem pole renovation celebrations They have passed now, but the notice has been there since then (at least that's when I first saw it - I passed it on the 484 and also took a photo!) -
Labour was damned, no matter what it did, when it came to the budget. It loves go on about the black hole, but if Labour had had its way, we'd have been in lockdown for longer and the black hole would be even bigger. Am I only the one who thinks it's time the NHS became revenue-generating? Not private, but charging small fees for GP appts, x-rays etc? People who don't turn up for GP and out-patient appointments should definitely be charged a cancellation fee. When I lived in Norway I got incredible medical treatment, including follow up appointments, drugs, x-rays, all for £200. I was more than happy to pay it and could afford to. For fairness, make it somehow means-tested. I am sure there's a model in there somewhere that would be fair to everyone. It's time we stopped fetishising something that no longer works for patient or doctor. As for major growth, it's a thing of the past, no matter where in the world you live, unless it's China. Or unless you want a Truss-style, totally de-regulated economy and love capitalism with a large C. -
If you read my post I expect a compromise with the raising of the cap on agricultural property so that far less 'ordinary' farmers do not get caught Clarkson is simply a high profile land owner who is not in the business as a conventional farmer. Here's a nice article that seems to explain things well https://www.sustainweb.org/blogs/nov24-farming-budget-inheritance-tax-apr/ It's too early to speculate on 2029. I expect that most of us who were pleased that Labour got in were not expecting anything radical. Whilst floating the idea of hitting those looking to minimise inheritance tax, including gifting, like fuel duty they also chickened put. I'm surprised that anyone could start touting for the Tories after 14 years of financial mismanagement and general incompetence. Surly not. A very low bar for Labour but they must be well aware that there doesn't need to be much of a swing form Reform to overturn Labour's artificially large majority. But even with a generally rabid right wing press, now was the opportunity to be much braver. -
And I worry this Labour government with all of it's own goals and the tax increases is playing into Farage's hands. With Trump winning in the US, his BFF Farage is likely to benefit from strained relations between the US administration and the UK one. As Alastair Campbell said on a recent episode of The Rest is Politics who would not have wanted to be a fly on the wall of the first call between Angela Rayner and JD Vance....those two really are oil and water. Scary, scary times right now and there seems to be a lack of leadership and political nous within the government at a time when we really need it - there aren't many in the cabinet who you think will play well on the global stage.
-