Jump to content

The Lounge

The place to relax and chat about anything.

22,548 topics in this forum

    • 3 replies
    • 695 views
  1. Adding photos

    • 1 reply
    • 1.6k views
    • 26 replies
    • 1.7k views
  2. Typical

    • 13 replies
    • 968 views
  3. Conman on EDF

    • 0 replies
    • 119 views
    • 44 replies
    • 2.9k views
    • 5 replies
    • 519 views
    • 1 reply
    • 427 views
  4. Need a word.... 1 2

    • 47 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 3 replies
    • 507 views
    • 24 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 24 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 393 views
  5. Hypocrite?

    • 8 replies
    • 354 views
    • 94 replies
    • 4.3k views
  6. Laying patios

    • 8 replies
    • 1.4k views
  7. Driving to Belvedere

    • 5 replies
    • 763 views
    • 7 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 15 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 18 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 3 replies
    • 554 views
  8. What's your Uber rating? 1 2

    • 31 replies
    • 2k views
    • 6 replies
    • 573 views
  9. Haye v Bellew

    • 0 replies
    • 527 views
  • Latest Discussions

    • A beer in the garden would have been nice, I'm sure! Mine was a meal inside. I don't remember much about it except that it was horrible.
    • Went to the Harvester a couple of times to have a beer in the garden, it was quite popular and had a 'certain' charm. 
    • I never went in The Grove when it was a pub, but I had a meal there once when it was a Harvester (I used to occasionally be a Mystery Shopper, and I was persuaded to go and have this meal because it was a bank holiday and they couldn't find anyone else to do it.) It was truly horrible. At least I got paid for eating it, albeit not very much, but I think I would have paid not to have to eat it. If it becomes an "affordable" restaurant again, I hope at least it has decent food. Why do "these youngsters" need "adult help" to be enterprising? They aren't six year olds! 
    • At the end of the day, whilst these youngsters have been enterprising presumably with adult help & I also assume no local youth group - the fact remains that it is a prime site fir redevelopment be it a supermarket - Aldi, Lidel whatever or social housing which, let’s be honest here lots  of people need.   Know Idea why has been derelict gor do long anyhow, but somewhere on this site I think there is a problem with who owns it. And let’s not forget the homeless man who slept there - Front on Lordship Lane who had his home destroyed by I assume vandals a couple of years ago.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...