For Sale & Items Offered
Sell or give away your articles
Rules for Selling Items on East Dulwich Forum
Only goods available for collection in SE22 and surrounding areas of South London may be listed for sale on this forum board.
Goods sold via EDF must be legal, safe, accurately described and fit for purpose.
The following items are not allowed to be sold or given away via the forum:
- Animals
- Tobacco
- Knives and other weapons
- Adult goods
Ensure your thread title accurately describes what you are selling. Please put the price of the item in the thread title where possible, e.g. "Leather Sofa - £50".
If you have a big list of similar items to sell at once (e.g. a garage sale) then please put them all in one thread. Do not create more than 3 topics per day per account.
Where possible, please attach a photo, or a link to a shop where the item can be purchased. To upload an image, simply click the 'Choose Files' link below the post text area.
All sale transactions must be organised independently between the buyer and seller. The East Dulwich Forum cannot have any involvement in the transaction and therefore will not take responsibility for disputes (e.g. faulty goods or misleading description). However, accusations of fraud are taken seriously - please report any such occurrences to the forum administrator via the Contact Us button at the bottom of the page.
139,739 topics in this forum
-
- 4 replies
- 410 views
-
- 0 replies
- 152 views
-
- 0 replies
- 176 views
-
- 0 replies
- 248 views
-
- 0 replies
- 250 views
-
- 1 reply
- 294 views
-
- 1 reply
- 217 views
-
- 0 replies
- 130 views
-
- 0 replies
- 153 views
-
- 5 replies
- 364 views
-
- 0 replies
- 223 views
-
- 4 replies
- 253 views
-
- 0 replies
- 351 views
-
- 1 reply
- 114 views
-
- 0 replies
- 186 views
-
- 0 replies
- 122 views
-
- 0 replies
- 151 views
-
- 0 replies
- 137 views
-
- 8 replies
- 471 views
-
- 0 replies
- 206 views
-
- 0 replies
- 141 views
-
- 3 replies
- 212 views
-
- 1 reply
- 228 views
-
- 0 replies
- 186 views
-
- 0 replies
- 186 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By Dulwich dweller · Posted
. I have messaged you. -
Link to this? I'll post Kuennsberg (spelling) link from this morning later. -
So for those families that can't afford to send children with special needs to private schools it's OK for them to get 'inferior' education? The Guardian article appears quite vague on reductions in numbers at private schools as this is happening in state schools too as the birth rate declines. Do those children going into reception at 4 count as compulsory school age? If so surely those that go private will be subject to VAT On the comment on state school class sizes it's shocking that numbers are larger than when I was at school. I'd like to think that Labour had done a proper assessment. The dieing days of the Tories was shocking, we want this policy, government analyists "poor return on assessment", government policy heads "this won't work" - ministers and SPADs - "just do it". Hoping Labour will be different despite too many early blemishes and poor decisions eg gifts. Telegraph is hardly going to support Labour. Headlines yesterday amused me. One in four pensioners over 80 will not get winter fuel payment. So, Daily Express they aren't short of money. And according to the Mail we are giving the Falklands back. Not that it would bother me, apart from (Port) Stanley is always a good answer on Pointless. But Labour would be silly if this was a policy. Ok, got into politics, and as said time will tell. Ps poor poor handling by Labour on winter fuel allowance
-
By David Peckham · Posted
I did a very quick & dirty calculation on this, based on the available numbers for England. Even assuming an elasticity of zero, ie no pupils leaving the private sector due to the tax rise, the net increase in the budget for the state sector would be around 3.5%. That's before any costs associated with collection and administration, which doesn't seem to have been particularly well thought through, according to the above Guardian article. It does all seem a bit 'dog whistle'. Even The Guardian calls the policy 'eye-catching' - there's very little substance to it. The net effect is negligible, given the trouble it'll cause.
-