For Sale & Items Offered
Sell or give away your articles
Rules for Selling Items on East Dulwich Forum
Only goods available for collection in SE22 and surrounding areas of South London may be listed for sale on this forum board.
Goods sold via EDF must be legal, safe, accurately described and fit for purpose.
The following items are not allowed to be sold or given away via the forum:
- Animals
- Tobacco
- Knives and other weapons
- Adult goods
Ensure your thread title accurately describes what you are selling. Please put the price of the item in the thread title where possible, e.g. "Leather Sofa - £50".
If you have a big list of similar items to sell at once (e.g. a garage sale) then please put them all in one thread. Do not create more than 3 topics per day per account.
Where possible, please attach a photo, or a link to a shop where the item can be purchased. To upload an image, simply click the 'Choose Files' link below the post text area.
All sale transactions must be organised independently between the buyer and seller. The East Dulwich Forum cannot have any involvement in the transaction and therefore will not take responsibility for disputes (e.g. faulty goods or misleading description). However, accusations of fraud are taken seriously - please report any such occurrences to the forum administrator via the Contact Us button at the bottom of the page.
140,897 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 144 views
-
- 2 replies
- 459 views
-
- 1 reply
- 163 views
-
- 0 replies
- 208 views
-
- 0 replies
- 156 views
-
- 2 replies
- 188 views
-
- 0 replies
- 226 views
-
- 4 replies
- 305 views
-
- 1 reply
- 271 views
-
- 2 replies
- 254 views
-
- 0 replies
- 253 views
-
- 3 replies
- 270 views
-
- 0 replies
- 202 views
-
- 0 replies
- 188 views
-
- 0 replies
- 228 views
-
- 1 reply
- 446 views
-
- 7 replies
- 735 views
-
- 1 reply
- 379 views
-
- 0 replies
- 192 views
-
- 0 replies
- 159 views
-
- 1 reply
- 234 views
-
- 7 replies
- 650 views
-
- 1 reply
- 273 views
-
- 0 replies
- 208 views
-
- 2 replies
- 302 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Farmers groups say 35% of farms will be affected while the Treasury reckons its 27% - neither figure is a tiny portion. The problem is farming is often asset rich but cash poor meaning that those who inherit farms and have to pay the tax will likely need to sell land to pay for it and could well further impact the cash poor nature and productivity of that farm. I would have thought those who align on the left would be welcoming farmers protesting on the streets against a government making their lives more difficult. Good on them. Makes a change from tube and rail strikes at least! I was shocked to read that the average weekly earnings for agricultural workers was significantly lower than the national average. Clearly Labour doesn't consider these working people. -
A tax change that affects a tiny portion of farmers livelihoods and income - mass protest and wild accusations on forums like this Brexit which impacted farmers income and uk food security far far far more ? Crickets. Absolutely nothing. “Price worth paying mate “ Don’t be fooled about what this is about - it’s isn’t IHT. -
In deed, doesn't matter if he is a talented presenter he is, in my view, an rrrrrrsss. Interestingly Farage was pronounced with a hard g. But he affected the continental soft g. Similar to the UK and US pronunciations of garage. I've worked with people who were at school with him -
Doesn’t seem that simple according to fullfact that’s a net figure ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ” I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues” I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible. BBC: It’s your own claim. Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”
-