What's on in East Dulwich
Playing a gig? Holding a fair? Spread the word about it here.
Check out our brand new Events Calendar. An organised version of What's on in East Dulwich.
Event hosts - please also add your events to the calendar.
13,083 topics in this forum
-
- 4 replies
- 190 views
-
- 0 replies
- 326 views
-
- 0 replies
- 266 views
-
- 0 replies
- 323 views
-
- 0 replies
- 163 views
-
- 0 replies
- 253 views
-
- 0 replies
- 349 views
-
- 2 replies
- 331 views
-
- 0 replies
- 147 views
-
- 1 reply
- 279 views
-
- 1 reply
- 319 views
-
- 0 replies
- 385 views
-
- 0 replies
- 344 views
-
- 0 replies
- 485 views
-
- 0 replies
- 328 views
-
- 0 replies
- 367 views
-
- 0 replies
- 388 views
-
- 0 replies
- 129 views
-
- 0 replies
- 339 views
-
- 0 replies
- 79 views
-
- 1 reply
- 147 views
-
- 0 replies
- 303 views
-
- 2 replies
- 223 views
-
- 0 replies
- 327 views
-
- 1 reply
- 282 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
it would seem very likely that they are trying it on if it their area - ie not a responsibility of the freehold. The freehold would cover the building structure (walls, foundation, roof) - possibly freeholder would have responsibility for the front door - if so, does the freeholder have the windows? Usually grey area in a lease so you could look at past instances - who has paid for window replacement, front door to be painted etc? -
By Dulwichlass · Posted
Thanks for these comments. Very helpful. The porch and hallway shows on their lease plan but we share the freehold together. -
By Cyclemonkey · Posted
Ok. You have bigger problems than this s20 notice. How have you let one freeholder dominate things. You both have the equal right to decide how to manage the communal areas of the property. I would get some legal advice on your duties and rights as a freeholder and then request a meeting to reset the relationship. Also as noted in other posts is the front yard and door actually the responsibility of the freeholder. These are all questions you should ask in your S20 response. -
seems perfectly sensible to restrict cert 18 but would have thought cert 15 are acceptable. we don't know what the complaint was or if the measures taken by the cinema address it or go too far. if there was a scenario when an infant was in a regular screening, then I would completely understand the complaint. if the complaint was from someone who attended a parent screening, then - well, I guess it depends what was on! if the complaint was from someone who has not involvement or experience then the cinema surely wouldn't have taken measures based on it
-