Jump to content

What's on in East Dulwich

Playing a gig? Holding a fair? Spread the word about it here.


Check out our brand new Events Calendar. An organised version of What's on in East Dulwich.

Event hosts - please also add your events to the calendar.


12,962 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 414 views
    • 1 reply
    • 360 views
    • 0 replies
    • 396 views
    • 0 replies
    • 527 views
    • 5 replies
    • 820 views
    • 0 replies
    • 342 views
    • 1 reply
    • 515 views
    • 0 replies
    • 271 views
    • 0 replies
    • 356 views
    • 0 replies
    • 296 views
    • 0 replies
    • 265 views
    • 0 replies
    • 374 views
    • 0 replies
    • 348 views
    • 0 replies
    • 495 views
    • 1 reply
    • 304 views
    • 0 replies
    • 278 views
    • 3 replies
    • 642 views
    • 1 reply
    • 519 views
    • 0 replies
    • 310 views
    • 0 replies
    • 332 views
    • 2 replies
    • 657 views
    • 0 replies
    • 476 views
    • 0 replies
    • 489 views
    • 0 replies
    • 436 views
    • 0 replies
    • 523 views
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's a few years since I last grappled with a Windows installation, but I don't recall ever having done any apparent harm by using a Windows installation or recovery drive for repair purposes, and it can be effective.  Reinstalling the boot manager software shouldn't be a big or precarious deal for it.  It's already identified the problem and knows how to repair itself.
    • But has it been established that poor sewerage infrastructure can be a cause of flooding, for which legal responsibility could then be rightly attributed to a water company?
    • They're not. But the work to build bunds which hold significant amounts of water in Dulwich and more recently Peckham Rye parks, was undertaken to mitigate the impacts of poor drainage and sewerage infrastructure (which was under invested in for years) causing flooding to properties. The latter is (as I understand it) the responsibility of the water companies. I believe taxpayers have paid for the underinvestment in infrastructure by the water companies in two ways; firstly, by paying to have the changes made to the parks (I never got a clear answer from Renata on this forum when I asked, but think this is the case); and secondly through the loss of amenity those schemes inevitably create when those parks are waterlogged through the winter months. As I said, privatised profits, socialised costs.
    • Our waste collectors tip the food bins straight into garden waste. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...