Cleaners
Request regular cleaning, housekeeping, end of tenancy cleaning, window cleaning etc.
⚠️ Only self-employed cleaners and housekeepers may self-promote their services on this board. Up to one 1 topic per month.
Check out our business directory if you require a professional cleaning agency.
466 topics in this forum
-
- 1 reply
- 623 views
-
- 0 replies
- 428 views
-
- 3 replies
- 831 views
-
- 1 reply
- 492 views
-
- 0 replies
- 466 views
-
- 1 reply
- 574 views
-
- 0 replies
- 382 views
-
- 0 replies
- 418 views
-
- 3 replies
- 611 views
-
- 0 replies
- 381 views
-
- 3 replies
- 778 views
-
- 1 reply
- 609 views
-
- 1 reply
- 687 views
-
- 0 replies
- 423 views
-
- 2 replies
- 786 views
-
- 0 replies
- 329 views
-
- 0 replies
- 587 views
-
- 0 replies
- 317 views
-
- 0 replies
- 287 views
-
- 0 replies
- 349 views
-
- 0 replies
- 292 views
-
- 0 replies
- 308 views
-
- 0 replies
- 381 views
-
- 1 reply
- 384 views
-
- 0 replies
- 355 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. -
I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you -
By creditwheredue · Posted
Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. -
-