Request a Tradesperson
Need a job done? Require a plumber, builder, gardener...? Ask in here!
Subforums
-
- 633
- posts
-
- 593
- posts
41,328 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 173 views
-
- 1 reply
- 294 views
-
- 0 replies
- 248 views
-
- 2 replies
- 463 views
-
- 1 reply
- 274 views
-
- 0 replies
- 221 views
-
- 3 replies
- 450 views
-
- 0 replies
- 299 views
-
- 0 replies
- 231 views
-
- 2 replies
- 290 views
-
- 0 replies
- 247 views
-
- 0 replies
- 172 views
-
- 0 replies
- 266 views
-
- 1 reply
- 434 views
-
- 0 replies
- 388 views
-
- 5 replies
- 507 views
-
- 1 reply
- 327 views
-
- 0 replies
- 203 views
-
- 0 replies
- 306 views
-
- 1 reply
- 435 views
-
- 0 replies
- 195 views
-
- 0 replies
- 191 views
-
- 0 replies
- 195 views
-
- 1 reply
- 254 views
-
- 2 replies
- 285 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
They just gave woolly and opaque policies on the basis of "we will not increase tax for working people" and then could not clearly define what a working person is. They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. the moment they got in they lent in to the notion that change will be slow due to global challenges. The electorate are impatient and Labour were always going to have a huge job to keep people onside and bought in to the (long) journey the country is on to any sort of recovery. Their first 100 days should have been about solidifying the electorate's support for the journey but instead they have lurched from one own-goal to another and I think significantly distanced themselves from the electorate as they have behaved just like the Tories in many aspects of leadership (access to donors, clothing gate). Throw in spin on the £22bn gap (of which around £9bn was based on their own decisions), Winter Fuel payments ending and the attack on farmers (the very definition of working people) and it has been an utter disaster. They have a massive perceptual problem and seem incapable of delivering crisp messages that the people can get behind. Listening to members of the government trying to explain the intricacies and details of much of the aforementioned challenges is utterly painful to watch and people shut off after a couple of sentences. In opposition you can get away with soundbites and when you get scrutinised you can bridge to "14 years of hurt" and "we're not them" and people will buy it. When you're in the hot seat those things sounds hollow and suggest you don't have the answers and people will turn on you very quickly. It is in everyone's interests that they get it right because with a Tory party chasing the far-right vote because of Reform and Reform picking up disillusioned main political party voters then the alternative is really scary. Of course, we also have the threat from within the Labour party itself as if things don't go well for Starmer & co we could find Labour turning on itself. -
Pounds, Shillings and Pence. Still remember decimalisation day. -
It’s very likely to be a mistake by a council contractor, so they should make good; also, someone else could be waiting for a much needed installation. It might be quickest to email your councillor, as they should be able to track down who’s responsible, rather than going from pillar to post with switchboards etc. -
-